Any arguments in favor do not exactly convince me of it. It's more so that I'm afraid of the possibility. There are definite issues with physicalism or at least materialism. I'm not sure if I'm convinced by attempts to explain away the explanatory gap by referencing the identities of non-phenomenal things that we do not question, like that of H2O, for example. That's the only somewhat reasonable argument I've heard. Dennettian-style eliminative materialism strikes me as downright absurd. Maybe David Pearce's nonmaterialist physicalism (
https://www.physicalism.com/) is right, idk. I do of course think empty individualism is more plausible than open individualism, but OI is not incoherent afaict. It may be the correct model. And like I said, veridical NDEs do give me pause, though I don't think they are necessarily proof of dualism.