Apathy79
Arcanist
- Oct 13, 2019
- 489
There are a few considerations. The death rate is going to be far lower if everyone in critical condition has access to medical care. So they need to slow down the rate of infection, even if the same number end up getting affected, because it will reduce deaths. That's the whole "flatten the curve" thing they babble on about.
But the severe shutdown methods to slow that infection rate have untold consequences in other areas, some of which have been alluded to here, so there's nothing black and white about this. One random thought that occurred to me recently is if everyone shuts their borders for a year, what happens to the 70M refugees in limbo? If people thought there was a refugee crisis last year, it just got at least 100x worse. And frankly that's just one of seemingly endless considerations our leaders are grappling with right now. I'd hate to be in their shoes.
But the severe shutdown methods to slow that infection rate have untold consequences in other areas, some of which have been alluded to here, so there's nothing black and white about this. One random thought that occurred to me recently is if everyone shuts their borders for a year, what happens to the 70M refugees in limbo? If people thought there was a refugee crisis last year, it just got at least 100x worse. And frankly that's just one of seemingly endless considerations our leaders are grappling with right now. I'd hate to be in their shoes.