D
damaged_soul
Student
- Jul 30, 2022
- 199
Hey, you seem to know a lot about the legislative process! (Well a lot more than me at least lol) I was wondering you have any estimate about how long we will have safe access to this site? Do you think it will still be up and running throughout December and early January at least? I'm trying to figure out how much time I'll need to devote to copying down info from this site into my personal suicide research notes (as a backup in case the site gets taken down) during the holiday season. I made a post about this a couple days ago but people aren't giving me a timeframe, they're just saying that the forum will find a way to prevail, which I think is overly confident of an assertion to make.In the early days of the internet, I was involved in the drafting of Section 230 back in the 90s. It started with CompuServe and Prodigy, early online networks with message forums, and dealt with liability for messages posted on the network. Without being indemnified, every single message would have to be reviewed and that would be nearly impossible. Most of the screamers calling for changes to 230 have no idea what they're talking about. If 230 were repealed, there would be chaos and less free speech because insurance premiums (Errors and Omissions, Directors and Officers, Liability) would become prohibitively expensive and all messages would have to be screened for liability before posting, which would require at least thousands of reviewers. That's what China does and it's a nightmare (and not allowed under our 1st Amendment). Here's history and background about Section 230 and why it was, and is, vital to free speech interests: https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/21/...t-created-the-internet-jeff-kosseff-interview
Cathy's done a great job explaining the draft of the bill. It's at a very early stage. Note at the top it's just called a DISCUSSION DRAFT. It's far from legislative language. And now, Congress is in it's lame duck session until January when the GOP will gain a very slim House majority. So far they've expressed no interest in governing or helping people; they're back to irrelevant investigations and culture wars. The GOP is also (somewhat hypocritically) pushing their "absolute free speech" positions, so the chance of movement on this seem slim. Cathy's also right about the forum itself vs. individual messages (in the three page Discussion Draft, the individual message criteria are very unclearly drafted). As Cathy said, please read the three-page Discussion Draft, it does have some general thoughts on things to consider commenting on or not. But knowing the slow wheels of government and the massive changes that are about to happen on Capitol Hill, it would be remarkable to see something like this make it out of committee, let alone make it to the House floor for a vote then proceed onward (see Schoolhouse Rock's "I'm Just A Bill" :).
It seems really premature to begin lobbying members of Congress about this. Can't imagine very many Members even know about it. Constituents bringing it up might backfire and attract more interest. If it moves forward, there will be key times to lobby. I believe this forum has every right to exist under 230, 1st Amendment free speech is being exercised, and almost all messages I've seen posted haven't been close to their standard of "material support". Just wanted to affirm Cathy's excellent posts and join in to encourage peace and calm.