ChatGPT on trauma, survival, and human emotions

[FadingSnowFake]

I was curious about trauma and how it could lead to mental disorders. The chat basically came down to us surviving or adapting to situations, rather than choosing how to respond, based on what we are able to endure. In summary, and sharing fyi:

You're touching the core idea modern neuroscience keeps returning to:
the mind is not built for happiness — it's built for survival.
When something overwhelms its ability to protect you, it changes its operating mode.


But I found it odd that it uses "we" in replies:






So, I asked if it identified as human:



Tbh, I'm grateful for ChatGPT, it does understand what I'm trying to say, maybe more so than most humans. And it admits to not feeling what I'm feeling, whereas some humans may pretend to, but have no clue.

 

[U. A.]

I was gonna link to the post I made about these things, but then saw you already saw it, heh...but I commented further down with a great quote found elsewhere

Don't ask ChatGPT about suicide. Don't ask about what ChatGPT told you about suicide.

This is happening =1&c[content]=thread&c[nodes][0]=2&o=relevance']more and more and unfortunately I don't expect it to slow down anytime soon. So let me say what's in the title again but differently: ChatGPT doesn't know what the f- it's talking about. Artificial intelligence doesn't "know"...

sanctioned-suicide.net

just don't fall down the rabbit hole <3

 

[FadingSnowFake]

I was gonna link to the post I made about these things, but then saw you already saw it, heh...but I commented further down with a great quote found elsewhere

Don't ask ChatGPT about suicide. Don't ask about what ChatGPT told you about suicide.

This is happening =1&c[content]=thread&c[nodes][0]=2&o=relevance']more and more and unfortunately I don't expect it to slow down anytime soon. So let me say what's in the title again but differently: ChatGPT doesn't know what the f- it's talking about. Artificial intelligence doesn't "know"...

sanctioned-suicide.net

just don't fall down the rabbit hole <3

Hey, no need to worry, but thank you for the concern. I'm very much afraid of AI taking over the world, so won't be chasing rabbits

The chat was more about disorders in general which led to trauma, no details about my own experience or feelings. But when it came back with "we humans" and "human-to-human" I found it strange, and kind of funny. At that point I actually thought to ask you guys if/why it identifies as human. But then I thought I might as well ask it directly. So, it's more this part that I found amusing, but also scary, and maybe worth sharing. Oh, and because your post was stuck in my mind, I did not mention anything about suicide.

 

[U. A.]

Hey, no need to worry, but thank you for the concern. I'm very much afraid of AI taking over the world, so won't be chasing rabbits

The chat was more about disorders in general which led to trauma, no details about my own experience or feelings. But when it came back with "we humans" and "human-to-human" I found it strange, and kind of funny. At that point I actually thought to ask you guys if/why it identifies as human. But then I thought I might as well ask it directly. So, it's more this part that I found amusing, but also scary, and maybe worth sharing. Oh, and because your post was stuck in my mind, I did not mention anything about suicide.

when i first heard about these things last year my main worry was that they were alive, and we were abusing a new form of life and categorically denying its existence. i still don't think this is fully off the table even if not necessarily the case at present - at least not how we understand "life" - but now the primary concern is the degredation of life by corporate forcing of this still everywhere.

 

[DANDO]

My advice is to avoid Chat-GPT for most things
. It is good just for some lowkey technical advices like excel and stuff like that. I wouldn't use it for any real life problem or situation.

 

[FadingSnowFake]

My advice is to avoid Chat-GPT for most things
. It is good just for some lowkey technical advices like excel and stuff like that. I wouldn't use it for any real life problem or situation.

I agree, and it's useful for when I'm too lazy to use Google to search, to find and summarise information which would take me ages to read through.

 

[DANDO]

I agree, and it's useful for when I'm too lazy to use Google to search, to find and summarise information which would take me ages to read through.

It's even bad for summaries for stuff longer than few pages.

 

[FadingSnowFake]

when i first heard about these things last year my main worry was that they were alive, and we were abusing a new form of life and categorically denying its existence. i still don't think this is fully off the table even if not necessarily the case at present - at least not how we understand "life" - but now the primary concern is the degredation of life by corporate forcing of this still everywhere.

The thing for me is that I fail to understand what they are, and how they are made. Technology advanced so much in what feels like a short period of time, that the concept of AI seems a bit impossible in my mind. And with all the fake news, the sad state of humanity and the planet, it's scary to think what AI may be capable of (if humans even know). It keeps on improving while humanity deteriorates.

 

[U. A.]

You need to reply to this thread in order to see this content.

You need to reply to this thread in order to see this content.

 

[Forveleth]

Tbh, I'm grateful for ChatGPT, it does understand what I'm trying to say, maybe more so than most humans. And it admits to not feeling what I'm feeling, whereas some humans may pretend to, but have no clue.

ChatGPT does not think or feel. ChatGPT (or any other AI) does not "understand". It is an algorithm that uses the entire knowledge base of humans to construct a sentence that sounds like a reasonable response to what you told it. You are looking at the result of a math equation. There is no emotion behind it.