that really sucks! do you know why it was delayed?
IMHO it's because only one of the members [there's eight or ten I forget] on the board has lived experience with mental illness.
In addition to that, it's a pretty novel concept and Canada is being inundated by disinformation at a grassroots level so I assume some of that exists at higher levels of society as well.
There are also real and practical reasons why taking our time is important. Imagine the consequences of a shoddy application.
In 2027 we will hear another ruling from this council without enough lived experience with mental illness. Hopefully it's in the favour of right-to-die. To be honest, with the amount of disinformation, I'm not open to the idea of the Canadian healthcare system accepting suicide tourism. It's not my decision, of course. But if we get this right it will be by the skin of our teeth and I've already mentioned the disinformation... suicide tourism will give ammunition to people who care to meddle in others' lives.
edit: I mean, this post's existence at all speaks to the disinformation. We are discussing the practical application of human rights here and euthanasia is still "respectfully" hard to access-- as to whether or not that is respectful, as long as society leans the way it does, then respect remains where it is. Canada has a lot of religiously conservative history, just different from the USA. There is also a fair amount of social conservatism. You'd have to know us ;-)