-
Hey Guest,
We wanted to share a quick update with the community.
Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.
👉 View the ledger hereOver the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):Ethereum (ETH):Monero (XMR):
bankai
Visionary
- Mar 16, 2025
- 2,340
It's possible it's been done. However, it's more likely that the bullet will explode and the shrapnel can go anywhere, so can it be done safely? No.
Worndown
Angelic
- Mar 21, 2019
- 4,252
zengiraffe
Student
- Feb 29, 2024
- 105
You can fire a bullet without a gun, but it won't go very fast, or be lethal.
The main thing the gun provides that accelerates the bullet to lethal speeds is a chamber and barrel that can withstand the gunpowder's explosion, and then block all of the hot exploding gas from escaping, so that the only way for it to go out is to push the bullet down the barrel, and that's what gives the bullet its speed.
Basically, without a chamber and barrel, ammo is pretty harmless.Similar threads
- deathisapanacea
- Suicide Discussion
Suicide DiscussiondeathisapanaceaSuicide Discussionbcarroll1
