TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,871
The state of limbo is the worst state to be in, because one would neither be enjoying life, nor be free of (perpetual) suffering. What do I mean by the state of limbo? The state of limbo is a condition or situation in which one is neither living and enjoying life, nor are they free of suffering from existence, it simply is sentient purgatory. Most of us are in this situation partly due to a combination of these factors: the survival instinct (preventing us from making the attempt to free ourselves, via CTB); no/difficult access to peaceful, reliable methods to check out (preferably peacefully); unable to make something out of life nor wish to (aka recovery); and of course, personal circumstances.
Why is this considered worse than death? This is worse than death because not only does one not have control over one's own fate, life, and body, but is actually compelled to live and unable to leave on one's own terms (should one decide to leave on one's own terms). With death, while tragic, the person's suffering has come to an end. As for those (pro-lifers) who enjoy life, death would be a loss to their enjoyment of life because of pleasure. Therefore, if there was three states of being, non-sentience, sentience, and sentience-limbo, being sentient but in limbo is the worst of the 3 because not only is one not enjoying life, one is also unable to seek the sweet release of death itself, thus being trapped in unwanted sentience and denied of pleasures/pleasant experiences during sentience.
As a result, this is why one should avoid being in such a predicament when possible. As a pro-choicer, I would say the other two options are better than being stuck in limbo because at least one is either enjoying life (recovery and or living on their terms) or ending their suffering (preferably with dignity and peacefully, but either way, death is the cessation of suffering and pain for the person).
What are your thoughts on this?
Why is this considered worse than death? This is worse than death because not only does one not have control over one's own fate, life, and body, but is actually compelled to live and unable to leave on one's own terms (should one decide to leave on one's own terms). With death, while tragic, the person's suffering has come to an end. As for those (pro-lifers) who enjoy life, death would be a loss to their enjoyment of life because of pleasure. Therefore, if there was three states of being, non-sentience, sentience, and sentience-limbo, being sentient but in limbo is the worst of the 3 because not only is one not enjoying life, one is also unable to seek the sweet release of death itself, thus being trapped in unwanted sentience and denied of pleasures/pleasant experiences during sentience.
As a result, this is why one should avoid being in such a predicament when possible. As a pro-choicer, I would say the other two options are better than being stuck in limbo because at least one is either enjoying life (recovery and or living on their terms) or ending their suffering (preferably with dignity and peacefully, but either way, death is the cessation of suffering and pain for the person).
What are your thoughts on this?