TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,654
It is not new, but most of us on here and those who have examined such topics as well as done some deep thinking over forced-lifers' philosophy and their view on sentience (life) itself, it all points to one conclusion, that most forced-lifers have a fear of death, which is coined thanatophobia. However, for us, we have a fear of continued suffering as we remain trapped until natural causes, other causes, or self-deliverance (CTB by one's own hand). Therefore, assuming that most forced-lifers who are against death in any conceivable manner, with perhaps the exception of the 'terminally ill', they will not accept any circumstance (even those who are chronically ill, or suffering indefinitely with little chance of relief) in which death is the more rational, merciful and dignified outcome, but instead want everyone to see it to the very (natural) end, regardless of others' wishes or the cost incurred to the recipient!
I have noticed a pattern that no matter how sound, rational, or well presented argument for pro-choice, or choosing death over suffering, it all leads back to one conclusion for forced-lifers (at least most of them), which is that they reject the outcome of death being the solution, and even become very intellectually dishonest or arguing in bad faith (even after being called out, or having their reasoning and logic challenged). This is very evident when one of the most avid pro-choicers, existentialgoof (EG) himself on Reddit oftenly argued about sentience being created by chaotic forces, not by an intelligent force and people who are alive are alive without their 'expressed, explicit' consent (every living organism that has come into existence came into such a state against it's will, only that intelligent organisms (humans) are able to introspectively acknowledge, recognize, and make sense of the burden of existence itself). In short, most forced-lifers are arguing in bad faith, meaning that they are not seeking to have their views changed or have an open mind (even those who claimed they are, but when challenged or pressed further, they become either hostile, irrational, or even fall flat on their logic). Essentially these people (forced-lifers) aren't there for an open dialogue when it comes to the right to die, and one of the most accurate reasons for their pushback, disingenuity, and behavior very likely stems from the fact that they are (secretly) afraid of death, and that sentience and life is all they know, so the absence of sentience (life) itself and nihlism (nothingness) triggers their fear of death, in which they project onto anything and everything that opposes that precarious view!
In the end, while there may be some people (albeit very rare) who are open to have their minds and viewpoints changed, most of these forced-lifers are not, and it is evident that once their precious view of the value of life is challenged or even contradicted in some way, they will automatically become defensive, disingenuous, and even outright hostile (presumptuous and not even arguing anything but throwing labels, prejudiced claims, and/or just attacks (ad hominems) on the person instead of having a rational, viewpoint). It no longer becomes a diagloue of understanding and discovery in hopes to seek the truth, but rather a contention and an verbal assault on those who don't share their view of the sanctity of life. Nevertheless, if forced-lifers have a fear of death, then we pro-choicers, have a fear of unwanting, continued sentience full of suffering, and it is an abomination that society and the masses do not consider that in those terms.
I have noticed a pattern that no matter how sound, rational, or well presented argument for pro-choice, or choosing death over suffering, it all leads back to one conclusion for forced-lifers (at least most of them), which is that they reject the outcome of death being the solution, and even become very intellectually dishonest or arguing in bad faith (even after being called out, or having their reasoning and logic challenged). This is very evident when one of the most avid pro-choicers, existentialgoof (EG) himself on Reddit oftenly argued about sentience being created by chaotic forces, not by an intelligent force and people who are alive are alive without their 'expressed, explicit' consent (every living organism that has come into existence came into such a state against it's will, only that intelligent organisms (humans) are able to introspectively acknowledge, recognize, and make sense of the burden of existence itself). In short, most forced-lifers are arguing in bad faith, meaning that they are not seeking to have their views changed or have an open mind (even those who claimed they are, but when challenged or pressed further, they become either hostile, irrational, or even fall flat on their logic). Essentially these people (forced-lifers) aren't there for an open dialogue when it comes to the right to die, and one of the most accurate reasons for their pushback, disingenuity, and behavior very likely stems from the fact that they are (secretly) afraid of death, and that sentience and life is all they know, so the absence of sentience (life) itself and nihlism (nothingness) triggers their fear of death, in which they project onto anything and everything that opposes that precarious view!
In the end, while there may be some people (albeit very rare) who are open to have their minds and viewpoints changed, most of these forced-lifers are not, and it is evident that once their precious view of the value of life is challenged or even contradicted in some way, they will automatically become defensive, disingenuous, and even outright hostile (presumptuous and not even arguing anything but throwing labels, prejudiced claims, and/or just attacks (ad hominems) on the person instead of having a rational, viewpoint). It no longer becomes a diagloue of understanding and discovery in hopes to seek the truth, but rather a contention and an verbal assault on those who don't share their view of the sanctity of life. Nevertheless, if forced-lifers have a fear of death, then we pro-choicers, have a fear of unwanting, continued sentience full of suffering, and it is an abomination that society and the masses do not consider that in those terms.
