ANYONE KNOW HOW TO CONTACT D

[jk9761]

ANYONE KNOW HOW TO CONTACT D

 

[Jrmull1993]

If you search through the forums you'll find his contact info.

 

[locked*n*loaded]

I think it involves setting up some type of sacred circle, burning some incense, maybe chanting some Latin verse, possible making some sacrifice to the powers that be..........that kind of thing.

If you search through the forums you'll find his contact info.

 

[blue_muse]

LE alert...

 

[FML_]

LE alert...

You know, I find it offensive that you're making the beautiful people on this forum out to be undercover agents

 

[blue_muse]

You know, I find it offensive that you're making the beautiful people on this forum out to be undercover agents

I find it offensive that good people, with varying vulnerability are taken advantage of by some new users with hidden agendas. Since my observation offends you, I suggest you take up the issue with one of the Moderators.

 

[FML_]

I find it offensive that good people, with varying vulnerability are taken advantage of by some new users with hidden agendas. Since my observation offends you, I suggest you take up the issue with one of the Moderators.

There's no need to involve the moderators. I already had the drop on 2 people from here, so tell me what's on

 

[that_guy2611]

If you search through the forums you'll find his contact info.

You mean the april '22 pph ?

 

[FuneralCry]

It's insensitive to go onto random threads and accuse people as being LE with no actual evidence to support this. If there is actual evidence of someone here to cause harm then people should report it to the mods rather than making claims on suffering peoples threads. Just because someone is desperate for N doesn't automatically make them suspicious.

It's a shame this forum has become so hostile. The cruelty of people are why so many people are suicidal in the first place. People have been through so much in life so the last thing they need is to be treated unfairly on here. Nobody would like it if people went on to their threads and accused them of being suspicious, so people should stop making claims with no real evidence.
I hope you find relief from your suffering OP. I'm sorry that life has brought you to this point.

 

[rationaltake]

We have no idea who anyone on here is. That's the reality of the internet.

It works both ways. We've had new members scamming people.

We've also had new members being targeted and scammed. Besides being given wrong information.

So being careful can protect new members who are genuine. Nobody should blindly trust information given out in replies without checking the source.

Scammers give out false information but even those who are genuinely trying to help can get it wrong.

I personally don't want to make an important decision based on third party information.

 

[blue_muse]

It's insensitive to go onto random threads and accuse people as being LE with no actual evidence to support this. If there is actual evidence of someone here to cause harm then people should report it to the mods rather than making claims on suffering peoples threads. Just because someone is desperate for N doesn't automatically make them suspicious.

It's a shame this forum has become so hostile. The cruelty of people are why so many people are suicidal in the first place. People have been through so much in life so the last thing they need is to be treated unfairly on here. Nobody would like it if people went on to their threads and accused them of being suspicious, so people should stop making claims with no real evidence.
I hope you find relief from your suffering OP. I'm sorry that life has brought you to this point.

We may have to agree to disagree because I stand by my original post. The savory stuff's availability suffered a similar fate, whereby an influx of new users feigned ignorance and asked for sources before the forum rules changed. Then, shortly afterwards regulation became tighter until it became pot luck in obtaining the savoury stuff. I make no apologies for pointing out the same pattern regarding this means (see how I'm careful with words). Resources are easily accessible to get contact details for you know who; I found it suspicious that some new members would ask for contact details via PM, when the information's readily available.

 

[GentleJerk]

DOWNLOAD THE PPH FROM THE RESOURCES SECTION.

...WAIT... WHY ARE WE YELLING!?

 

[Ash’Girl]

Do ya think LE would be that in your face?

Also, since people say "download xxx book" and confirm the page number (I'm not saying whether that's good or bad) then I figure LE would just do that: I don't think they can shop people for sharing an email address, so if they have decent detective skills (which they should if they're working cyber crimes or whatever), then they already know

They probably get every new version of the book on subscription direct from source anyway.

I overthink, therefore I am.

Hello OP, welcome to our little corner of the universe.

Ps @GentleJerk that wasn't a dig at you I think you posted whilst I was typing!

 

[blue_muse]

DOWNLOAD THE PPH FROM THE RESOURCES SECTION.

...WAIT... WHY ARE WE YELLING!?

Hallelujah!

This code talk was starting to resemble a prison conversation.

On a serious level; if the seller has been compromised, use caution as it sounds like a deja vú of what happened to the previous seller. I have a suspicion that the banned user London, could be part of the clampdown (if there is one).

Do ya think LE would be that in your face?

Also, since people say "download xxx book" and confirm the page number (I'm not saying whether that's good or bad) then I figure LE would just do that: I don't think they can shop people for sharing an email address, so if they have decent detective skills (which they should if they're working cyber crimes or whatever), then they already know

They probably get every new version of the book on subscription direct from source anyway.

I overthink, therefore I am.

Hello OP, welcome to our little corner of the universe.

Ps @GentleJerk that wasn't a dig at you I think you posted whilst I was typing!

Perhaps your memory of the scammer London is a distant one then . LE have to be shapeshifters by nature on a site like this one. I didn't perpetuate that LE can "shop people for sharing an email address"; I merely pointed out that giving potential LE a shortcut, to information readily available may not be in members' best interests.

Your remark about over-thinking suggests you've read posts I've made in unrelated threads, which makes your comment a cheap shot. Considering you're also a new member, you might want to throw less stones from your glass house.

 

[Ash’Girl]

Hallelujah!

This code talk was starting to resemble a prison conversation.

On a serious level; if the seller has been compromised, use caution as it sounds like a deja vú of what happened to the previous seller. I have a suspicion that the banned user London, could be part of the clampdown (if there is one).

Perhaps your memory of the scammer London is a distant one then . LE have to be shapeshifters by nature on a site like this one. I didn't perpetuate that LE can "shop people for sharing an email address"; I merely pointed out that giving potential LE a shortcut, to information readily available may not be in members' best interests.

Your remark about over-thinking suggests you've read posts I've made in unrelated threads, which makes your comment a cheap shot. Considering you're also a new member, you might want to throw less stones from your glass house.

Not really, I don't think I've read any of your other posts. Maybe, without registering the username. Nor was I directly coming at you, or anyone, just sharing my thoughts.

Thanks for making it feel safe and welcoming to do so.

 

[blue_muse]

Not really, I don't think I've read any of your other posts. Maybe, without registering the username. Nor was I directly coming at you, or anyone, just sharing my thoughts.

Thanks for making it feel safe and welcoming to do so.

Making and voicing an observation in the manner I did, to help prevent others getting scammed or finding themselves on the radar of actual LE, is hardly advocating a hostile environment. The savory stuff became unavailable in the way I've described in previous posts, which doesn't make my perspective one that stems from over-thinking or paranoia.

For a new member, you might want to rethink how you speak to members who've been here before you.

 

[Ash’Girl]

Making and voicing an observation in the manner I did, to help prevent others getting scammed or finding themselves on the radar of actual LE, is hardly advocating a hostile environment. The savory stuff became unavailable in the way I've described in previous posts, which doesn't make my perspective one that stems from over-thinking or paranoia.

For a new member, you might want to rethink how you speak to members who've been here before you.

I'm sorry you think my overthinking and musing on the topic was a direct hit at you. It wasn't actually intended as such, my brain just fires off on tangents and here is about the only place I ever seem to engage it of late. I don't know the posts you're talking about the savoury stuff and sources.

I appreciate that people here for some time may have born witness to various scams etc and tbh can't say I know very much of anything about the specifics, probably not even the vagueries (yes, made up word) and wish to warn accordingly. Truth is I know anyone could be anyone: it's the internet. I was just generally musing.

Anyway, I will cease to chip in with my thoughts and wish you good day, because I never intended or wanted to go head to head with you or anyone.

 

[locked*n*loaded]

For a new member, you might want to rethink how you speak to members who've been here before you.

So, now, someone's thoughts, opinions, musings, etc. should be expurgated according to some hierarchical system based on tenure? Let us all call this new system the, "Don't talk back to your elders" doctrine.

 

[Ticket 2 Heaven]

Derailed thread lol

 

[jk9761]

We may have to agree to disagree because I stand by my original post. The savory stuff's availability suffered a similar fate, whereby an influx of new users feigned ignorance and asked for sources before the forum rules changed. Then, shortly afterwards regulation became tighter until it became pot luck in obtaining the savoury stuff. I make no apologies for pointing out the same pattern regarding this means (see how I'm careful with words). Resources are easily accessible to get contact details for you know who; I found it suspicious that some new members would ask for contact details via PM, when the information's readily available.

all the sources are a dead end , i am just desperate . if you dont know what people are going thru then keep your opinions to yourself

 

[locked*n*loaded]

all the sources are a dead end , i am just desperate . if you dont know what people are going thru then keep your opinions to yourself

Try to be as patient as you can, like the rest of us, and let's just see where all this goes. Hopefully, everything will get rectified and work out in the end.

 

[jk9761]

Try to be as patient as you can, like the rest of us, and let's just see where all this goes. Hopefully, everything will get rectified and work out in the end.

THANKS . I WILL .

 

[FML_]

For a new member, you might want to rethink how you speak to members who've been here before you.

That's not a reason to accuse innocent people of being agents. Anyways, I found out your real name and where you live already. Kinda funny how you go to such lengths not to share any information and I found it out anyway. If you would've been more considerate of other people you wouldn't have to walk around with the thought that someone on this forum knows your identity.

 

[blue_muse]

I'm sorry you think my overthinking and musing on the topic was a direct hit at you. It wasn't actually intended as such, my brain just fires off on tangents and here is about the only place I ever seem to engage it of late. I don't know the posts you're talking about the savoury stuff and sources.

I appreciate that people here for some time may have born witness to various scams etc and tbh can't say I know very much of anything about the specifics, probably not even the vagueries (yes, made up word) and wish to warn accordingly. Truth is I know anyone could be anyone: it's the internet. I was just generally musing.

Anyway, I will cease to chip in with my thoughts and wish you good day, because I never intended or wanted to go head to head with you or anyone.

Right, well, with that kind of sarcastic non-apology (e.g. "I'm sorry you feel...") I guess a truce isn't an option.

So, now, someone's thoughts, opinions, musings, etc. should be expurgated according to some hierarchical system based on tenure? Let us all call this new system the, "Don't talk back to your elders" doctrine.

Nope. I knew my place as a newbie for a long time and listened to SS veterans (from Reddit) and those with more knowhow, before carving out an identity. Figuratively speaking, you wouldn't necessarily turn up up late to a party then try stealing attention.

That's not a reason to accuse innocent people of being agents. Anyways, I found out your real name and where you live already. Kinda funny how you go to such lengths not to share any information and I found it out anyway. If you would've been more considerate of other people you wouldn't have to walk around with the thought that someone on this forum knows your identity.

I hope you have the same criticism for fellow member Shu, who's, in a different thread, openly theorised that the banned scammer London may have assumed another identity. Such judgement from a new member like yourself is slightly ironic. I suggest you read my earlier post about what happened to the savory stuff.

Your post reads as a thinly guised threat—the kind seen from Fixthe26. Since you know my real name and where I live; I await to be doxxed then. Perhaps you'll spread discontent via PMs to other members instead, as a way of banishing me from SS. I call your bluff to publicly reveal my name and address. You can't do anything on here that's not been done to me already in real life.

 

[blue_muse]

[removed quote]

No, I'm not missing the point and that's why I said some users - some doesn't mean all. It's well known that banned users resurface with new identities on SS. You talk of evidence as though members must satisfy your subjective criteria of what constitutes proof—this is no courtroom and you are no more a judge than I am the accused. The savory stuff became restricted in ways previously described; new members enquired about sources, before the Moderators changed the rules, and one by one the sources disappeared.

You have no interest in hurting me, but threaten to reveal my name and address as a thinly veiled threat. I call your bluff to reveal such personal details with the audience watching this thread at present. Such actions make you just as contemptuous as outside saboteurs like Fixthe26. Your doxxing threat conflicts with the ethos of SS.

 

[locked*n*loaded]

How to contact D turned into all this crap?!

 

[Shu]

Right, well, with that kind of sarcastic non-apology (e.g. "I'm sorry you feel...") I guess a truce isn't an option.

Nope. I knew my place as a newbie for a long time and listened to SS veterans (from Reddit) and those with more knowhow, before carving out an identity. Figuratively speaking, you wouldn't necessarily turn up up late to a party then try stealing attention.

I hope you have the same criticism for fellow member Shu, who's, in a different thread, openly theorised that the banned scammer London may have assumed another identity. Such judgement from a new member like yourself is slightly ironic. I suggest you read my earlier post about what happened to the savory stuff.

Your post reads as a thinly guised threat—the kind seen from Fixthe26. Since you know my real name and where I live; I await to be doxxed then. Perhaps you'll spread discontent via PMs to other members instead, as a way of banishing me from SS. I call your bluff to publicly reveal my name and address. You can't do anything on here that's not been done to me already in real life.

Hold up don't try to put me into these things. Every user that I have ever assumed that was up to no good has been BANNED. I have been right about every user that I was skeptical about and I have had reasons to doubt them from the jump. With that other user they are presenting themselves the exact same way as the two other users that have been banned already.

[removed quote]

Theorize? "Shu" knows for a fact there are people watching this website. "Shu" hasen't accused anyone of being Law Enforcement unless he is joking with users in chat or on Discord. "Shu" has been right about every single user so far that he has been skeptical about and every one of those users are banned. Are you going to threaten to dox me too? I'll dox myself. What are you going to do send the police to my house? Try to contact my family and tell them I'm on a suicide website? Leak my social security number? Try to have me involuntarily admitted? Go ahead. Go for it buddy. You may have my identity but you don't know where the SN is and I'll still be having a nice salty drink when the time comes which will be soon.

 

[FML_]

No, I'm not missing the point and that's why I said some users - some doesn't mean all. It's well known that banned users resurface with new identities on SS. You talk of evidence as though members must satisfy your subjective criteria of what constitutes proof—this is no courtroom and you are no more a judge than I am the accused. The savory stuff became restricted in ways previously described; new members enquired about sources, before the Moderators changed the rules, and one by one the sources disappeared.

You have no interest in hurting me, but threaten to reveal my name and address as a thinly veiled threat. I call your bluff to reveal such personal details with the audience watching this thread at present. Such actions make you just as contemptuous as outside saboteurs like Fixthe26. Your doxxing threat conflicts with the ethos of SS.

Wow. I can't believe you're taking what I'm saying so out of context. I didn't even say half of the stuff you're putting in my mouth. How tf do I LITERALLY tell you that I have no interest in spreading your dox and then you're telling ME that I actually do?

Anyways, I just gave you your initial as proof that I know who you are and you're ignoring it. I don't feel like spending any more time arguing with you if you don't even read what I'm saying.

Don't be pissed if you get into any trouble in the future, because at this rate you might. And no that's not a threat because I don't feel like acting on it. There's more people that'll find out who you are if you can't even pick a unique username for this website.

 

[Shu]

Wow. I can't believe you're taking what I'm saying so out of context. I didn't even say half of the stuff you're putting in my mouth. How tf do I LITERALLY tell you that I have no interest in spreading your dox and then you're telling ME that I actually do?

Anyways, I just gave you your initial as proof that I know who you are and you're ignoring it. I don't feel like spending any more time arguing with you if you don't even read what I'm saying.

Don't be pissed if you get into any trouble in the future, because at this rate you might. And no that's not a threat because I don't feel like acting on it. There's more people that'll find out who you are if you can't even pick a unique username for this website.

Maybe because you're the one who brought up doxxing people in the first place and now you're threatening "don't be pissed if you get in trouble on the future because you just might" you're cool as fuck man. Trying to cause suicidal people more issues than they already have when all we're trying to do is look out for scammers and predators and protect other members by doing so.

 

[FML_]

Maybe because you're the one who brought up doxxing people in the first place and now you're threatening "don't be pissed if you get in trouble on the future because you just might" you're cool as fuck man. Trying to cause suicidal people more issues than they already have when all we're trying to do is look out for scammers and predators and protect other members by doing so.

Yet another person who doesn't even read what I'm saying. Check the next 2 sentences after the one you just quoted

I only doxxed someone because they are being a dick to innocent people, not because I want to cause suicidal people issues. I said this in one of my previous posts in this thread. Are you on drugs or what?



You can tell me when you come up with some arguments that are based on logic and I'll continue talking to you