
symphony
surving hour-by-hour
- Mar 12, 2022
- 779
Well this is quite the can of worms, but I'm gonna chime in anyways.
When children and teens commit suicide, I am more likely to find it especially tragic, but I do not condemn it or "frown upon" it.
The choice to end one's own life should be universal. Saying children shouldn't CTB because they can't do so rationally is a slippery slope we shouldn't go down. You claim "their underdeveloped brains aren't mature enough". Well, the brain isn't fully developed until about age 25 and the frontal lobe, helping control impulsivity and rationality, is last to develop. Should young adults like myself, old enough to vote or enlist in the army, be barred from suicide because "our underdeveloped brains aren't mature enough"? Should the elderly with dementia be barred for the same reason?
Using the capacity for rationality as a metric in determining when suicide is acceptable is frankly a terrible idea. Sure, children may be irrational here. But people can (and do!) easily extend this to argue that anyone with mental illness is definitionally irrational and thus shouldn't be able to commit suicide. Many argue that suicide is inherently irrational and thus never okay.
Just because these people are young does not necessarily mean their suffering is any less real or any more solvable. Yes, it may occur that a teen going through a breakup or brief depression may attempt, and this is undeniably tragic. But the way to fix it is not by saying they should never be able to CTB, but rather by educating them about mental illness, suicide, and importantly, treatment options to consider before suicide. At the same time, though, you can't know 100% of the time with 100% certainty that "they would eventually overcome [their suffering] in time". Maybe they wouldn't. Should we require them to stick around and keep suffering despite that possibility? You could make the same argument for a rational, intelligent suicidal adult. Perhaps they, too, could overcome it in time, so it would be wrong for them to CTB, right?
But importantly, the most vulnerable among us (children, the intellectually disabled, and elders) are often least able to access options short of suicide. A chronic victim of abuse may not even know or believe there is help available for them and may be highly incapable of asking for that help, largely because of the control their abusers wield over them. If they are able to ask for help, they may not be believed. It happens all too often that children running away from abusive homes are just returned home by the authorities. Expecting someone in this situation to "get emancipated maybe" is pretty overly simplistic and idealistic.
To sum it all up, I guess, if anyone has the right to die, if I have the right to die, then so should everyone else. So no, even if I may be saddened by teen suicide, I do not "frown upon" it.
When children and teens commit suicide, I am more likely to find it especially tragic, but I do not condemn it or "frown upon" it.
The choice to end one's own life should be universal. Saying children shouldn't CTB because they can't do so rationally is a slippery slope we shouldn't go down. You claim "their underdeveloped brains aren't mature enough". Well, the brain isn't fully developed until about age 25 and the frontal lobe, helping control impulsivity and rationality, is last to develop. Should young adults like myself, old enough to vote or enlist in the army, be barred from suicide because "our underdeveloped brains aren't mature enough"? Should the elderly with dementia be barred for the same reason?
Using the capacity for rationality as a metric in determining when suicide is acceptable is frankly a terrible idea. Sure, children may be irrational here. But people can (and do!) easily extend this to argue that anyone with mental illness is definitionally irrational and thus shouldn't be able to commit suicide. Many argue that suicide is inherently irrational and thus never okay.
Just because these people are young does not necessarily mean their suffering is any less real or any more solvable. Yes, it may occur that a teen going through a breakup or brief depression may attempt, and this is undeniably tragic. But the way to fix it is not by saying they should never be able to CTB, but rather by educating them about mental illness, suicide, and importantly, treatment options to consider before suicide. At the same time, though, you can't know 100% of the time with 100% certainty that "they would eventually overcome [their suffering] in time". Maybe they wouldn't. Should we require them to stick around and keep suffering despite that possibility? You could make the same argument for a rational, intelligent suicidal adult. Perhaps they, too, could overcome it in time, so it would be wrong for them to CTB, right?
But importantly, the most vulnerable among us (children, the intellectually disabled, and elders) are often least able to access options short of suicide. A chronic victim of abuse may not even know or believe there is help available for them and may be highly incapable of asking for that help, largely because of the control their abusers wield over them. If they are able to ask for help, they may not be believed. It happens all too often that children running away from abusive homes are just returned home by the authorities. Expecting someone in this situation to "get emancipated maybe" is pretty overly simplistic and idealistic.
To sum it all up, I guess, if anyone has the right to die, if I have the right to die, then so should everyone else. So no, even if I may be saddened by teen suicide, I do not "frown upon" it.