It's not a couple's "personal" choice. By DEFINITION. (Because saying so is clearly an oxymoron...)
Anton didn't observe what i'm about to say in his vídeo.
Bringing or not bringing a new life into the world is not a personal choice for the same reasons pro-lifers, religious or not, don't want «women killing "Babies" in their tummies», because they think it's somewhat of a sinful/wrongful thing to do to a third person.
How weird is that...?! In some unexpected way, pro-lifers and "nay-lifers" agree to disagree in regards to what's at stake here: the life (or not) of a third person. Hence, we can ALL agree that decisions regarding the life of a third person are not ours to make.
This third person is the one who should be regarded as the most important person in the decision making process, but unfortunately, and frequently, her will and well-being is completely disregarded as the "heat" of the argument rises within the hysteria of every public debate.
(This somehow reminded me of a South Park episode where Kenny gets really sick and actually dies. When Kenny's last Will is finally found, it's already too late...)
All that being said....
I take the antinatalist position because it's the most logical answer to the problem of our well-being in our human predicament, since non-existence is always preferable to existence, when one doesn't exists yet.