TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,874
This was just an analogy that crossed my mind with regards to life/sentience itself. Whenever we came into existence against our will, the duration of our suffering varies and while some people are fortunate and end up at the finish line sooner or even in a better shape, there are many others who cross the finish line at a time that they did not wish to (not on their own terms) or in worse shape. What does the finish line have to do with life and sentience? Well, when life itself is like an "unwanted competition/race" and the finish line itself is analogous to non-sentience and/or death. However, everyone (as with all living and sentient beings) will eventually cross the "finish line", just not exactly in the way that one wishes to go.
We pro-choicers just want to cross the finish line even if it means 'cheating' or 'skipping' there and pro-lifers are like the anti-cheat team in the unwanted competition. There are some people who managed to slip by the 'anti-cheat' team and got to the finish line (non-sentience, death) successfully. However, there are many more people who attempt to 'cheat' but end up getting caught either planning, conspiring, or even attempting to but failing to do so. As a penalty, the people in the competition (the cheaters from the anti-cheat team's pov) are then punished in some way. This may include reduced progress, set back from the competition, maybe even torture and/or other consequences from them, depending on what the anti-cheat team wishes to dole out.
Hope this analogy made sense and that it gives insight into how and why pro-lifers seem to be adamantly against the right to die and seek to compel everyone to suffer in the 'sentience competition'. I thought this small analogy would make sense and perhaps others can see how sentience and life itself is rather forced sentience and full of suffering. Of course, there are many more factors and this analogy may be oversimplified, but conveys my point nonetheless.
What do you guys think, do you find this to be a pretty accurate analogy of sentience and suffering itself?
@Forever Sleep @FuneralCry
We pro-choicers just want to cross the finish line even if it means 'cheating' or 'skipping' there and pro-lifers are like the anti-cheat team in the unwanted competition. There are some people who managed to slip by the 'anti-cheat' team and got to the finish line (non-sentience, death) successfully. However, there are many more people who attempt to 'cheat' but end up getting caught either planning, conspiring, or even attempting to but failing to do so. As a penalty, the people in the competition (the cheaters from the anti-cheat team's pov) are then punished in some way. This may include reduced progress, set back from the competition, maybe even torture and/or other consequences from them, depending on what the anti-cheat team wishes to dole out.
Hope this analogy made sense and that it gives insight into how and why pro-lifers seem to be adamantly against the right to die and seek to compel everyone to suffer in the 'sentience competition'. I thought this small analogy would make sense and perhaps others can see how sentience and life itself is rather forced sentience and full of suffering. Of course, there are many more factors and this analogy may be oversimplified, but conveys my point nonetheless.
What do you guys think, do you find this to be a pretty accurate analogy of sentience and suffering itself?
@Forever Sleep @FuneralCry