cryone
Experienced
- Nov 23, 2023
- 258
being pro life doesn't necessarily mean you think life is inherently good. i mean, existentialists can be pro lifers. i can't rly form a good response to ur argument but these are rly two distinct things. a death penalty is given to (ostensibly) serve justice and protect other lives. being pro life is also protecting life. n even if life is inherently good doesn't mean it can't be utilized to do bad things. i mean, food is generally viewed as beneficial but you can also eat too much n fuck yourself over. thats rly the best analogy sorry.Doesn't death penalty and pro life have directly contradicting premises. If you're pro life you have to assume that there's some innate goodness to life. What happens to these supposed terrible people? What if it's not even their fault that they turned out like that? If life is inherently good then I don't see how anyone could support death penalty.
i can say this abt anything. well theres highschool dropouts that make more money, even more than doctors. is this a solid argument to quit hs to make more money? or even this: some people don't hit the gym and are still fit, even more than those who hit the gym. is this a solid argument to quit working out to become muscular?Well there are families who wanted to have the kid and neglected them even more than kids are neglected in a foster home.
there will always always be exceptions, but the key is to look at the whole picture.
i cant rly argue anything else if we don't both believe this. if you don't want a kid, the chances of neglecting them are significantly increased. you dont have to intentionally abuse a child to treat them badly.I don't think there is a correlation between not wanting a kid and treating them badly as a result
Last edited: