I'm pretty sure this isn't gonna be peaceful and relatively painless. I prefer not to suffer for several days or weeks but that's just my opinion.
Here you are wrong. Instead we only talk about lethality. When you write "all methods can fail", you are talking only and exclusively about lethality. And it's a lie, because there are foolproof methods. No, it's not peaceful and it's not cheap. This, however, is another topic.
What is the point of you proving wrong a phrase not meant to be taken literally?
Don't play with words. I never said there was no cure for some mild types of radiation poisoning. I was very specific and talked about a certain isotope. I then asserted that if taken in certain quantities it is infallible and death is certain. This is not the first time it has been used in history. This demonstrates that certain methods exist. It is not important the availability, the pain, the transfiguration of the body etc etc... Here in the forum many people have presented very brutal options, such as immolation. I wouldn't do it...so what? Whether you like the method or not is irrelevant, I'm sorry if the photo doesn't suit you. Are you climbing on mirrors to prove what? There is no salvation after ingesting a very small amount of polonium and you can write whatever you want and try to convince whoever you want. The cure presented by the other user for polonium radiation poisoning is fresh water. The goal was to demonstrate the infallibility of a method for suicide. And when a procedure achieves an objective, it is in fact a method.
Well, it depends on what you want to achieve. The market is very strong, both on the web and among the mafias.
you're trying to ultimately prove a point that has no bearing on the right to die movement as it stands. things like accessibility absolutely do matter. that's easy to learn just looking at the forum here. if something is essentially inaccessible to 99.9% of people, what's the point?
Nembutal is also essentially inaccessible to 99% of users here. Did two of them succeed? Even obtaining opioids and drugs on the web gets people into legal problems, yet they do it and write about it.
I understand your point, however, after hearing that someone wanted to commit suicide by self-crucification, no method seems too violent in comparison
Radiation poisoning is definitely awful but the only case of skin melting off I've heard about is the Japanese guy who got caught in a particle accelerator and was irradiated by the beam of ultra high energy particles. From what I've read ingesting radioactive material won't burn your skin, but will cause nausea and stomach bleeding and can cause organ failure. The risk though is even if you do get your hands on some the purity isn't assured, and if you survive you'll be guaranteed to get exotic cancers later in life.
Hemlock will give definite lethality at the right dose. As several others have mentioned though in what manner and with what time do you want to pass.
First of all, the title of your form said 100%. Second of all, I wish to know if you read my message about actual treatments for radiation poisoning, because I'm not sure why you won't mention those specific proven methods. The reason I care so much is because I find it shameful to go onto a form and create a new "100% lethal" method without understanding the core mechanics behind radioactive substances, not to mention being so confident that you are right. It is blatant misinformation, and that sickens me. You said someone told you the cure was fresh water, but you didn't mention the popular and working inhibitors such as potassium iodine. On access; If you can find a website that sells purified polonium 210, and that isn't a honey pot, it would be a miracle. How do you think the mafia works, that you can just go up and ask for polonium 210? Good luck finding a dealer before that source decays, with a half life of 4 and a half months. Again, Polonium 210 will kill you without medical treatment, and it will be painful. But there is so many ways to fuck it up on the way. People do survive radiation poisoning, because its a change in the cells. The element is throwing electrons at you, so many things could happen or not happen. It's a complex subject that has more thought than "100% lethality" or "No cure". It is foolish to believe that angry electrons will always give you supercancer. That is why I am replying to you. Because it is a blunt mockery of the subject as a whole, and a painful agonizing "method" that would not be recommended on the site.
I'm sorry it disgusts you, but your post is totally useless. You will not be able to save anyone who takes 20 micrograms of this substance, not even 10, not even 5, or much less. All the treatments you have proposed will not stop the 100% certain lethality. This shows that the method (regardless of its availability which is not the subject of discussion in the thread, but was cleverly added so as not to admit that there are methods effective in 100% lethality) guarantees death. And would you treat polonium 210 poisoning with iodine? Congratulations I have not recommended this method to anyone. This is a place where you can talk freely about everything and often we talk about methods that are not available, inaccessible or impracticable. The mafias deal with radioactive material, it's true. But I didn't write that they deal with these pure isotopes. Producing what is needed would cost thousands of euros. The mafias supply many other radioactive materials and I repeat that I am not recommending them, but they are still 100% lethal with horrible deaths generally. Highly radioactive materials have always been on the market and there is no need to go to the Transnistra where in the open air you find abandoned Soviet missiles and highly toxic products of all kinds managed by criminals. There is uranium trafficking that the mafias import from Africa and other parts. However, there is no cure for 5 micrograms of polonium 210 ingested, that's the point. You can't fail.
I don't seem to have offended anyone or even to have adopted extreme attitudes. However, I have read many posts with extreme advice (one user here even talks about someone who proposed crucifixion and extreme pain has also been talked about as a method on other occasions). I have often talked about methods such as LPG, hydrogen sulphide, guillotine. They are all methods that cause little or no suffering, certainly better than the hanging you often talk about. Yet I do not attack those who use brutal methods such as immolation. But if you like to call me a troll, it's all the same to me, you probably love pointing the finger at those you don't approve of. I am not interested.
