TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,707
When life sucks or any ills and suffering that one finds, a common phrase uttered by anti-choice, ctb prohibitionists, and ctb preventionists, ultimately boils down to "you just have to accept it." While they don't say it exactly word for word, almost all their remarks and advice boils down to just that, accepting the suck and dealing with it by living and continuing to suffer. This is one of the most dismissive, invalidating remarks ever to be said to a pro-choicer or someone who wishes to go.
First off, the question is why? Why should anyone accept a circumstance that they are not comfortable with. I don't think it is irrational to not accept a certain outcome as long as one understands the overall situation. Not accepting an outcome is not an indication of irrationality or mental illness, especially if the individual knows the reality itself.
Furthermore, why must one accept the reality of suckiness and shortcomings of life, let alone to continue enduring awful sentience that is life itself? If anything, if one knows that life sucks and is willingly not going to accept it (knowing that their choice of death is an option and voluntarily choosing to end one's suffering), then it should not be deemed irrational. A lot of mental health and therapy is only focused on accepting the suckiness of life and coping with it. That's great if people want to continue living in suffering and coping until natural causes or other causes of death ends their sentience, but for those who rather skip all the non-sense and unnecessary suffering for years or decades to come and die on their own terms, the gatekeepers decree it to be irrational, which is so backwards and has no logical grounds. There is no rational, objective reason for why suffering, life, and accepting that life sucks is a good thing. It isn't a good thing (relatively speaking) and the best thing to do is end that suffering if one so chooses to. If one is not willing to accept the outcome, then one should be afforded the dignity of ending one's own suffering in a dignified manner.
I think the biggest problem in a nutshell is how pro-lifers, prohibitionists, and preventionists view life as something that must be accepted along with all it's faults, ills, imperfections, and suffering. It shouldn't be. In fact, recognizing that life sucks and wanting to leave it voluntarily, especially after careful deliberation, should be considered a rational decision.
First off, the question is why? Why should anyone accept a circumstance that they are not comfortable with. I don't think it is irrational to not accept a certain outcome as long as one understands the overall situation. Not accepting an outcome is not an indication of irrationality or mental illness, especially if the individual knows the reality itself.
Furthermore, why must one accept the reality of suckiness and shortcomings of life, let alone to continue enduring awful sentience that is life itself? If anything, if one knows that life sucks and is willingly not going to accept it (knowing that their choice of death is an option and voluntarily choosing to end one's suffering), then it should not be deemed irrational. A lot of mental health and therapy is only focused on accepting the suckiness of life and coping with it. That's great if people want to continue living in suffering and coping until natural causes or other causes of death ends their sentience, but for those who rather skip all the non-sense and unnecessary suffering for years or decades to come and die on their own terms, the gatekeepers decree it to be irrational, which is so backwards and has no logical grounds. There is no rational, objective reason for why suffering, life, and accepting that life sucks is a good thing. It isn't a good thing (relatively speaking) and the best thing to do is end that suffering if one so chooses to. If one is not willing to accept the outcome, then one should be afforded the dignity of ending one's own suffering in a dignified manner.
I think the biggest problem in a nutshell is how pro-lifers, prohibitionists, and preventionists view life as something that must be accepted along with all it's faults, ills, imperfections, and suffering. It shouldn't be. In fact, recognizing that life sucks and wanting to leave it voluntarily, especially after careful deliberation, should be considered a rational decision.