
TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,012
Note: I am an atheist and don't believe in God(s), but I just had an interesting thought and am curious to hear others' thoughts on this.
So the scenario is: If you were God (assuming you were omniscient (all knowing), omnipotent (all powerful), and omnipresent (can be anywhere/everywhere at any given time), what would you do if you were in the position to be able to affect things (positively or negatively), especially the affairs of humans (or any other sentient species)?
Personally, if I were God, and given the facts presented in this thread, I would only intervene when necessary to ensure the balance of humanity and/or other species. I would do this because as a pro-choicer, the stance of pro-choice would be balance and allowing 'true' freedom for one to choose. Therefore, if that balance has been thrown off by any faction, then as God, I would seek to restore the balance. For instance, if pro-lifers dominate humanity (like they do in our reality and timeline), oppressing those who are pro-choice, then I would intervene to restore the balance. Similarly, if there are too many pro-mortalists and they are pushing too much in the direction of forcing people (who want to live) to die, then I too, would intervene to ensure balance.
How much intervention and in what manner would I intervene, it would depend on the degree of imbalance, though for simplicity purposes, I would intervene in indirect ways primarily.
Case A:
So in the case of pro-lifers overwhelming dominate humankind, I would pull strings indirectly to ensure the survival of pro-choicers and maybe even cause some pro-life movements to fail. Specifically in policy making, I would pull strings such as ensuring that pro-lifers' plans have slight deviations that cause them to fail (e.g. curse them with faulty logic so their arguments make them foolishly, induce impaired judgment at critical times, thus allowing pro-choicers the opening they need to secure victory, etc.)
Case B:
In the case of pro-mortalists pressuring and/or directly causing the deaths of people who otherwise wish to thrive or live, I too, would create circumstances that allows the people who wish to live to survive and/or ensure they don't completely go extinct. I would do so by granting resiliency to pro-lifers, and/or interfere with the hardcore pro-mortalists who try to exterminate pro-lifers.
(e.g. giving knowledge of safe places for pro-lifers to go to so they don't get captured and killed, create situations that frustrate or impede that of pro-mortalists, allowing pro-lifers to have a fighting chance to exist.)
Of course, given that I have the power of omnipotency, I could do more, but again, for simplicity purposes, I would oftenly go for indirect intervention as to not overly meddle in humanity's affairs. Then after balance is restored, I would again, become dormant in my own universe/realm.
What would you do?
So the scenario is: If you were God (assuming you were omniscient (all knowing), omnipotent (all powerful), and omnipresent (can be anywhere/everywhere at any given time), what would you do if you were in the position to be able to affect things (positively or negatively), especially the affairs of humans (or any other sentient species)?
Personally, if I were God, and given the facts presented in this thread, I would only intervene when necessary to ensure the balance of humanity and/or other species. I would do this because as a pro-choicer, the stance of pro-choice would be balance and allowing 'true' freedom for one to choose. Therefore, if that balance has been thrown off by any faction, then as God, I would seek to restore the balance. For instance, if pro-lifers dominate humanity (like they do in our reality and timeline), oppressing those who are pro-choice, then I would intervene to restore the balance. Similarly, if there are too many pro-mortalists and they are pushing too much in the direction of forcing people (who want to live) to die, then I too, would intervene to ensure balance.
How much intervention and in what manner would I intervene, it would depend on the degree of imbalance, though for simplicity purposes, I would intervene in indirect ways primarily.
Case A:
So in the case of pro-lifers overwhelming dominate humankind, I would pull strings indirectly to ensure the survival of pro-choicers and maybe even cause some pro-life movements to fail. Specifically in policy making, I would pull strings such as ensuring that pro-lifers' plans have slight deviations that cause them to fail (e.g. curse them with faulty logic so their arguments make them foolishly, induce impaired judgment at critical times, thus allowing pro-choicers the opening they need to secure victory, etc.)
Case B:
In the case of pro-mortalists pressuring and/or directly causing the deaths of people who otherwise wish to thrive or live, I too, would create circumstances that allows the people who wish to live to survive and/or ensure they don't completely go extinct. I would do so by granting resiliency to pro-lifers, and/or interfere with the hardcore pro-mortalists who try to exterminate pro-lifers.
(e.g. giving knowledge of safe places for pro-lifers to go to so they don't get captured and killed, create situations that frustrate or impede that of pro-mortalists, allowing pro-lifers to have a fighting chance to exist.)
Of course, given that I have the power of omnipotency, I could do more, but again, for simplicity purposes, I would oftenly go for indirect intervention as to not overly meddle in humanity's affairs. Then after balance is restored, I would again, become dormant in my own universe/realm.
What would you do?