K
Kain10th
Member
- May 7, 2020
- 99
just trying to think of the most selfless act one can do. an act that contains the least if any ego at all and benefits other people. Would self sacrifice be that?
We wanted to share a quick update with the community.
Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.
š View the ledger here
Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
If one values one's own life then I guess yes.
I know someone who died helping a stranger with a car problem. He didn't save anyone's life but he was simply being a good samaritan and got knocked over the barrier by a car and then run over by another on the street below. That was quite pure. He died like an angel.
I would think so.just trying to think of the most selfless act one can do. an act that contains the least if any ego at all and benefits other people. Would self sacrifice be that?
he was definitely a good person, but that seems more like an accident than an act of self sacrifice.
Which is what makes it so pure: He didn't do it for any noble reason or for glory; he just stopped to help a stranger. Drove him to a gas station. Drove him back. Waited to make sure that fixed things. When it didn't he got out of his car and looked at the engine. He sacrificed time and effort to do good on his way home from work, and died of it.
But you mean something more like the various miners and soldiers and engineers at Chernobyl who knew they were getting lethal doses and shrugged it off.
Do you think it matters that many of the Chernobyl liquidators were uncouth types who weren't given any choice, who told each other it probably wasn't really that bad, and/or were so downtrodden by authorities they had no confidence in that they did their job with active hatred rather than goodness in their hearts?
All respect to them, mind you. I'm just curious about our attitudes. Some of the primo examples of self-sacrifice are types many of us wouldn't feel comfortable sharing a cafeteria table with.
Yehoshua was another famous self-sacrificer. A brown rabblerouser who hung out with iffy types, tossed tables around in the temple courtyard, talked back and arguably committed suicide by Roman police. If he turned up today he'd probably be given electroshock therapy.
@Sensei, does there need to be a purpose to the suffering? Like it will save someone if I opt for that? Does it become nobler/ more selfless if it saves more people, or if it saves only one?
I used to have a recurring dream that I was hearing my abusive guardian screeching and squealing from hell, begging me to take her place there, for eternity. What's the right response to that?
Maybe I should clarify: to choose stay alive and suffer incredible torment instead instead of escaping through death. There's no moral, no symbolism, just a suggestion what the ultimate selfless act might be.
I don't know if it is, it depends on your motivation, I guess. I'd probably sacrifice my life, but mostly for the selfish reason of wanting to die. If my death makes someone's life better it is a win, as my life will only suck more and more with time passing by.just trying to think of the most selfless act one can do. an act that contains the least if any ego at all and benefits other people. Would self sacrifice be that?