N
noname223
Archangel
- Aug 18, 2020
- 6,028
So the conditions had to be fulfilled to get access to N.
Why am I asking? I think it is an interesting question. Many here (including me) are in favor of assisted suicide. Though especially for people with mental illness they have higher criteria. There are some restrictions. I have to admit I don't know the official criteria. I think in my country it is not clearly regulated. But I think people with mental illness need to get the approval of two different psychiatrists which is pretty difficult. Also due to the fact so many psychiatrists oppose assisted suicide for mentally ill.
I know many here already have done a lot of therapy others have made negative experiences which turned them sceptical. So maybe some have inner principles not to accept such a deal. Personally for me I had no problem to go through such a process.
Here the fictional (I don't know the reality it probably depends on the country) criteria:
1. Taking two different medication - for a certain time to evaluate whether they work. You decide whether they work.
2. Making a therapy for a couple of months - it probably depends on the problems which one should be done
3. Having an appointment with a counselor for example to discuss financials, to discuss alternatives to suicide
4. Assuring during a period of 6 months that your wish to die is persistent
In my opinion the process should be for free and cost 0 euros. And if you fulfill the criteria you will get N.
I think this scenario is not necessarily realistic. I am no expert but I think there are more restrictions usually.
I think it is an interesting thought experiment.
I think in order to get the right to die there will have to be made compromises.
So for me if I had an offical not illegal and secure way to get access to N this would be relief. I am highly anxious to do something illegal and if I am doing it on my own I think I might end up damaged. These are two of my biggest fears. So I would clearly go for it. I think I would now postpone it (because I try to fight) but I think there would be a time when I would accept this process.
And for the people who are sceptical about suicide there would be reassurance that people would have gone through a process. And it would be clear the person had persisting suicidal thoughts and thought it through.
I could imagine there will be many replies who will be sceptical about such a process. Some have certain philosophical arguments why they would not want such a treatment.
Some are sceptical about medication and their influence. It is not clear how many people had to do such a process. Some people here are not mentally ill. But this would make it even more complicated.
There will be of course people who say. There should be no compromises in order to get the right to die because it is a human right.
I can understand that though I think in the political discussion (realistically) they will demand compromises and concessions.
Personally I would be okay with this solution. I had no problem to fulfill these criteria. An official way to die would be a huge relief. The concessions would not be that bad for me because I already fulfilled the criteria. And if I had to fulfill them a second time I would still go for it.
However there are even people who don't care about such an official process. They don't care about assisted suicide. I am certainly not one of them. But for example these people might consider such a solution as unnecessary.
So what is your take on it?
Why am I asking? I think it is an interesting question. Many here (including me) are in favor of assisted suicide. Though especially for people with mental illness they have higher criteria. There are some restrictions. I have to admit I don't know the official criteria. I think in my country it is not clearly regulated. But I think people with mental illness need to get the approval of two different psychiatrists which is pretty difficult. Also due to the fact so many psychiatrists oppose assisted suicide for mentally ill.
I know many here already have done a lot of therapy others have made negative experiences which turned them sceptical. So maybe some have inner principles not to accept such a deal. Personally for me I had no problem to go through such a process.
Here the fictional (I don't know the reality it probably depends on the country) criteria:
1. Taking two different medication - for a certain time to evaluate whether they work. You decide whether they work.
2. Making a therapy for a couple of months - it probably depends on the problems which one should be done
3. Having an appointment with a counselor for example to discuss financials, to discuss alternatives to suicide
4. Assuring during a period of 6 months that your wish to die is persistent
In my opinion the process should be for free and cost 0 euros. And if you fulfill the criteria you will get N.
I think this scenario is not necessarily realistic. I am no expert but I think there are more restrictions usually.
I think it is an interesting thought experiment.
I think in order to get the right to die there will have to be made compromises.
So for me if I had an offical not illegal and secure way to get access to N this would be relief. I am highly anxious to do something illegal and if I am doing it on my own I think I might end up damaged. These are two of my biggest fears. So I would clearly go for it. I think I would now postpone it (because I try to fight) but I think there would be a time when I would accept this process.
And for the people who are sceptical about suicide there would be reassurance that people would have gone through a process. And it would be clear the person had persisting suicidal thoughts and thought it through.
I could imagine there will be many replies who will be sceptical about such a process. Some have certain philosophical arguments why they would not want such a treatment.
Some are sceptical about medication and their influence. It is not clear how many people had to do such a process. Some people here are not mentally ill. But this would make it even more complicated.
There will be of course people who say. There should be no compromises in order to get the right to die because it is a human right.
I can understand that though I think in the political discussion (realistically) they will demand compromises and concessions.
Personally I would be okay with this solution. I had no problem to fulfill these criteria. An official way to die would be a huge relief. The concessions would not be that bad for me because I already fulfilled the criteria. And if I had to fulfill them a second time I would still go for it.
However there are even people who don't care about such an official process. They don't care about assisted suicide. I am certainly not one of them. But for example these people might consider such a solution as unnecessary.
So what is your take on it?
Last edited: