Thanks to @sohosquare for making a notch on the other side too.
I would like to try to bring some additional facts into the discussion.
My belief is that grown-up people need to be treated with the same respect as grown-up people.
In the legal analysis, however, the extent to which the perpetrator is able to assess his actions as lawful is always taken into consideration. For this reason, drunk or intoxicated drivers, for example, are judged differently than willful speeders. In the legal system, the actions of young people are weighted according to the same principles. In order to find a standard for this, numerous medical brain examinations were used. These state that the consciousness of a person changes significantly up to the age of 21.
A subdivision was then derived:
- less than 14 years of incapacity,
- less than 18 years of conditional liability
- from the age of 21 as an adult.
Here we see where the 18 year age limit comes from. It is medically indicated and itself a compromise between 14 and 21.
The challenge now is how adolescents can be brought to the topic of self-determination.
In my opinion, it should be ensured that the exchange of opinions offered should be designed according to their individual level of development.
But this forum, if it doesn't want to lose its spontaneity, can probably not guarantee that.
I wish every youngster here to find a responsible mentor for PM's.