An update on the OFCOM situation: As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. OFCOM, the UK’s communications regulator, has singled out our community, demanding compliance with their Online Safety Act despite our minimal UK presence. This is a blatant overreach, and they have been sending letters pressuring us to comply with their censorship agenda.
Our platform is already blocked by many UK ISPs, yet they continue their attempts to stifle free speech. Standing up to this kind of regulatory overreach requires lots of resources to maintain our infrastructure and fight back against these unjust demands. If you value our community and want to support us during this time, we would greatly appreciate any and all donations.
if i search "sanctioned suicide" on duckduckgo it returns a result for sanctionedsuicide.site
on google it returns sanctioned-suicide.net (with a hyphen)
i am trying to confirm both are legitimate and one isn't a man in the middle site
man in the middle site would use a different https certificate to decrypt data going into the site so they could associate IP addresses with usernames
because google just labeled this site as dangerous, i thought it wouod be sensible to ask
i was too lazy to compare the SHA of the hashes. since the SHA comes from an American company, the US government couod demand the certificate key in a secret hearing and determine all IPs and how they link to who is logging in anyway.
i am trying to confirm both are legitimate and one isn't a man in the middle site
man in the middle site would use a different https certificate to decrypt data going into the site so they could associate IP addresses with usernames
because google just labeled this site as dangerous, i thought it wouod be sensible to ask
i was too lazy to compare the SHA of the hashes. since the SHA comes from an American company, the US government couod demand the certificate key in a secret hearing and determine all IPs and how they link to who is logging in anyway.
Well that is curious. If I were to guess, I'd say that the `.site` domain is the development version of this site, where new features are added and tested. But I have absolutely no evidence to support this
From my understanding, there are different identical SS links "mirrors" for backup and censorship purposes. There is no difference between the sites except the link.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.