
Anxieyote
Sobriety over everything else • 31 • Midwest
- Mar 24, 2021
- 444
I don't think government-assisted euthanasia will be approved for the average citizen anytime soon. Here are some of my reasonings behind why I think that, but I do hope I am proven wrong.
If it's easy and accessible, mothers of the deceased are going to storm into the doctor's office and say, "You killed my son!!" to whoever prescribed the peaceful pill. The doctors who do prescribe it may be killed in turn by disgruntled family members who feel like what the doctor did was the equivalent of murder; and justify it in their head with "eye for an eye" logic.
Then there will be protests with signs saying "Murder is illegal. Why did we make an exception?" or photos of doctors who prescribe the pills on giant billboards saying, "THESE MEN ARE MURDERERS." Religious people will also have many things to say on the matter; and many a sermon to preach.
The emotional pleas are always going to be too strong, especially when we are talking about people who have lived on this planet for awhile. Because not only do those people have a history of being useful to the establishment (keeping the economy and workplaces functioning), but also to other humans who have vested interest in keeping them alive.
They likely have partners, friends, coworkers, kids, who have developed emotional attachments to them; and although the term "used" may come across as insensitive when you're talking about people who care about them; it's not unreasonable to assume that there can be a degree of selfishness at play for wanting to prevent someone else's death.
It would not be very convenient (or preferred) for a wife to have her husband die, for example. Now she has to pull double-duty raising the kids by herself, or finding a new partner to mitigate the responsibilities of her life and the lives of her children.
Either way, it is a large burden and emotionally-taxing. And since wanting to prevent someone's death is typically seen as "caring", they would not even need to provide reasonable justifications for objecting to their death. Their personal motives for wanting that person to stay alive wouldn't be questioned; always presumed to come from a "caring" place—even if their primary motive for doing so was because they would personally benefit to prolong the suffering of said individual.
I will never forget the conversation I had with my mother after I got back from my first psychiatric ward visit. She said, "Please don't end your life…I want to be seen as a good mother; and no one would see me as one if you did that."
That frank admission helped me to see that a person's identity is just a collection of their personal narratives; and that our presence contributes to those narratives. My role as my mother's son is to prove to the rest of the world that she is a good mother; through my successes and personal achievements. A dead son would undermine the narrative that she was a good mother (or at least assumes that's how most would see it).
Abortion access is a much easier pill to swallow for the masses. None of us have met or interacted with an aborted baby, but thousands of people have interacted with a person by the time they would qualify for a MAiD referral. "I want to die" will never be accepted as an admission of consent, and those who knew the individual will present a billion reasons as to how their lives could be fixed.
Could've, would've, should've; these hypotheticals don't really matter once the suffering has reached a certain point. I can only speak for myself, but I am tired of theorizing what my life could potentially be; I just want it to end—which is well enough of a justification coming from an adult.
My dream would be to at least see an age requirement for death consent in our lifetime. Imagine how much relief that would bring; knowing that no matter how hard things got, no matter how much pain you were suffering through—you would have a "finish line" to reach. We already do, but is it fair for someone who has made up their mind at 25 that life is not preferable to them; to wait until they reach age 85 or 90 to die of natural causes? It's only reasonable we have a MAiD service for those individuals.
But for the reasons I listed, I am not optimistic. I am least thankful I live in a time where the information is freely disseminated enough that I can find websites like this that provide information about CTB methods. Let's hope it lasts.
If it's easy and accessible, mothers of the deceased are going to storm into the doctor's office and say, "You killed my son!!" to whoever prescribed the peaceful pill. The doctors who do prescribe it may be killed in turn by disgruntled family members who feel like what the doctor did was the equivalent of murder; and justify it in their head with "eye for an eye" logic.
Then there will be protests with signs saying "Murder is illegal. Why did we make an exception?" or photos of doctors who prescribe the pills on giant billboards saying, "THESE MEN ARE MURDERERS." Religious people will also have many things to say on the matter; and many a sermon to preach.
The emotional pleas are always going to be too strong, especially when we are talking about people who have lived on this planet for awhile. Because not only do those people have a history of being useful to the establishment (keeping the economy and workplaces functioning), but also to other humans who have vested interest in keeping them alive.
They likely have partners, friends, coworkers, kids, who have developed emotional attachments to them; and although the term "used" may come across as insensitive when you're talking about people who care about them; it's not unreasonable to assume that there can be a degree of selfishness at play for wanting to prevent someone else's death.
It would not be very convenient (or preferred) for a wife to have her husband die, for example. Now she has to pull double-duty raising the kids by herself, or finding a new partner to mitigate the responsibilities of her life and the lives of her children.
Either way, it is a large burden and emotionally-taxing. And since wanting to prevent someone's death is typically seen as "caring", they would not even need to provide reasonable justifications for objecting to their death. Their personal motives for wanting that person to stay alive wouldn't be questioned; always presumed to come from a "caring" place—even if their primary motive for doing so was because they would personally benefit to prolong the suffering of said individual.
I will never forget the conversation I had with my mother after I got back from my first psychiatric ward visit. She said, "Please don't end your life…I want to be seen as a good mother; and no one would see me as one if you did that."
That frank admission helped me to see that a person's identity is just a collection of their personal narratives; and that our presence contributes to those narratives. My role as my mother's son is to prove to the rest of the world that she is a good mother; through my successes and personal achievements. A dead son would undermine the narrative that she was a good mother (or at least assumes that's how most would see it).
Abortion access is a much easier pill to swallow for the masses. None of us have met or interacted with an aborted baby, but thousands of people have interacted with a person by the time they would qualify for a MAiD referral. "I want to die" will never be accepted as an admission of consent, and those who knew the individual will present a billion reasons as to how their lives could be fixed.
Could've, would've, should've; these hypotheticals don't really matter once the suffering has reached a certain point. I can only speak for myself, but I am tired of theorizing what my life could potentially be; I just want it to end—which is well enough of a justification coming from an adult.
My dream would be to at least see an age requirement for death consent in our lifetime. Imagine how much relief that would bring; knowing that no matter how hard things got, no matter how much pain you were suffering through—you would have a "finish line" to reach. We already do, but is it fair for someone who has made up their mind at 25 that life is not preferable to them; to wait until they reach age 85 or 90 to die of natural causes? It's only reasonable we have a MAiD service for those individuals.
But for the reasons I listed, I am not optimistic. I am least thankful I live in a time where the information is freely disseminated enough that I can find websites like this that provide information about CTB methods. Let's hope it lasts.