Jessica-
Experienced
- Mar 26, 2019
- 263
SN was ( and may still be my method). IIRC it used to be scored higher on the reliability scale. Why was the score revised to only 6 in the latest PPeH?
Last edited:
It is ONLY a 6 because it can be reversed and because there aren't many documented reports of monitored deaths
Because 60% of the time, it works every time. That's half a joke and half a reality. I'm certainly not making light of it. In truth, the effectiveness of SN in killing someone cannot be known because there hasn't been clinical trials on humans for obvious reasons. The score or 6/10 seems to be made up. It still seems fairly lethal, but.... It's not guaranteed. Knowing this hasn't helped me, but it's at least the truth.
The score or 6/10 seems to be made up. It still seems fairly lethal, but.... It's not guaranteed. Knowing this hasn't helped me, but it's at least the truth.
I know you were joking by that is definitely NOT the case. If you take 20-25g of SN with all the anti-emetics and anti-acids it is very likely that you will die; not 60% of the time, everytime.
I agree with the confidence. SN seems lethal. I'm not really joking about the estimate. If you look up poisoning statistics on lostallhope.com you'll notice the lower odds. For all we know it's 40% or 80%. Saying it's guaranteed isn't true. Anecdotal evidence on here suggests some have survived large doses. Maybe they were lying, but... How could you know?
@JustOverIt , while you claim to be through and objective, you have failed to provide a shred of evidence to substantiate your claims. Can you please provide some links?
Please look for them yourself, there is a tonne of information on this forum about it. It is not my fault if you distrust people. I'm not about convincing people, just about giving them reasonably trusting information. People are going to make their minds up on their own either way.
How much do you trust accounts written by complete strangers on a suicide forum?
That is true we are all strangers here so I understand your reluctance. Though I hope my presence and contributions to it can affect your trust somehow.
You would really instill confidence if you can provide some links to your claims.
Some of the claims I make are made by common sense made from the information available to me through Nitschke's PPEH and livestreams + also from some case reports and one or two articles: I do not claim to have all/any of the answers just educated opinions from scowering this method heavily, like I have said. I am well aware that those case reports and articles on this forum can be scrutinized to hell so feel free to do so.
At one point, you claimed that SN is the second most reliable method, how did you come to that conclusion?
"For Nitrite, a larger quantity is needed, vomiting risk greater, and reliability is a little less, R=6."It seems really arbitrary but why would they lower it from a 7 or 8( I can't remember exactly, sorry)
Given that its the second method with the most solid information attached to it.
It goes N 100% guaranteed death over 1000's of monitored cases. Then SN, 6 monitored deaths.
Have you not heard of cyanide, fentanyl, firearms, jumping from height or even chloroquine ( where a report was done that all 50 patients died with 2-3 hrs)
"For Nitrite, a larger quantity is needed, vomiting risk greater, and reliability is a little less, R=6."
in Mar. 2019 where PN said "[v]omiting is possible though".
"For Nitrite, a larger quantity is needed, and reliability is a little less, R=7."
in Oct. 2018 where he said "[v]omiting is unlikely."
Well what are we talking about? Effectiveness or peacefulness? I should have written that SN is the second most reported peaceful method. Or third or fourth or fifth like does it matter? It's reportedly peaceful.
According to you above, in terms of lethality.
Dude why are we even arguing?
We are only discussing whether my current method of choice ( due to lack of means) is peaceful and effective, the more info we share , the better for us and others considering this method. Given you have so much faith in this method, it would be good to pick your brain.
Right, well if that is the case just try to phrase your responses a bit less invasively so I don't misinterpret you being unnecessarily abrupt. Feel free to pick away.
ok, my apologies!
Could you kindly provide some credible evidence to your claim that the SN method is both peaceful and reliable. Preferably with some links? This would great assist me and others considering the method given you have in- depth knowledge on the subject. Thanks!
Please give me a few minutes I guess while I gather all the information I have used to back my opinion of the SN method with.
This forum is over a year old, if you want to know for yourself then start digging, go through the user discussion thread, sn megathread and consider taking Philip Nitschke at his word. He calls SN the poor man's Nembutal, it's rated a 6 because of how easily it can be reversed- unlike the other inorganic salts. There's a fine line between skepticism and cynicism and I'm afraid you're leaning towards the latter.You would really instill confidence if you can provide some links to your claims.
There's a fine line between skepticism and cynicism and I'm afraid you're leaning towards the latter.