Where in the world does the government execute foreigners for committing blasphemy or public desecration of the Quran?

[Dot]

U hve bn askng abt ths snce 2023 tho

 

[Kay_Philosopher]

These countries do not always follow a set plan. You might just get beaten until they swap you in a prisoner exchange.
They might kill you using one of their more inventive methods. Google them and be afraid.
If you really need to go, be in control of that exit.

That is precisely why I want to find one that does :/

Just countries that execute someone for blasphemy with decisive evidence and a confession. It is tough, you know?

U hve bn askng abt ths snce 2023 tho

These things take time to think about lol

 

[Worndown]

Everyone has their specific reasons.
Do you have a way of getting into any of these countries? If not, it is just idle hope.

 

[TragedyBornCrimson]

That is precisely why I want to find one that does :/

Just countries that execute someone for blasphemy with decisive evidence and a confession. It is tough, you know?

These things take time to think about lol

There are far easier ways to ctb than this. Do you want your ctb to cause international outcry or to be a martyr? I just can't comprehend how this would be a good method in anyway as there is so much outside of your control.

 

[Kay_Philosopher]

Everyone has their specific reasons.
Do you have a way of getting into any of these countries? If not, it is just idle hope.

So, after doing some research, I've compiled these likely countries were acquiring a visa for first world countries to enter is trivial:

Pakistan
Afghanistan
Nigeria
Saudia Arabia
Iraq


The problem is that only the first two actually have the blasphemy laws codified. Pakistan has never enancted the death penalty before and has only kept the accused locked up indefinitely. Albeit, no one has ever confessed to committing blasphemy, nor has there ever been overwhelming evvidence to convict them of 295C.

Afghanistan is much more stricter but has no published data for the incumbent regime now.

There are far easier ways to ctb than this. Do you want your ctb to cause international outcry or to be a martyr? I just can't comprehend how this would be a good method in anyway as there is so much outside of your control.

Think about it like this:
Execution = 100% effective and safe
Doing this for a good cause while effectively shining light on the problems with the law in the first place = Good virtue signaling
Survival Instinct is non-existent as you can't run or have your sentenced commuted if charged and found guilty.

 

[Whale_bones]

So, after doing some research, I've compiled these likely countries were acquiring a visa for first world countries to enter is trivial:

The problem is that only the first two actually have the blasphemy laws codified. Pakistan has never enancted the death penalty before and has only kept the accused locked up indefinitely. Albeit, no one has ever confessed to committing blasphemy, nor has there ever been overwhelming evvidence to convict them of 295C.

Afghanistan is much more stricter but has no published data for the incumbent regime now.

So there you go. You're completely aware that even the strictest countries don't have published data or things like "video evidence" that you keep asking for. Tons of people have explained this to you, in every which way it could be explained.

Doing this for a good cause while effectively shining light on the problems with the law in the first place = Good virtue signaling

You've already said in past threads that you wanted to be a martyr for something to do with Christianity. It's very funny that you state your intention is to virtue signal though Virtue signaling literally means you don't have genuine personal convictions about the issue, the goal is to signal to other people that you're a good, moral person by picking an issue the majority of people agree on and talking about it repeatedly and loudly.

Meanwhile, a person who virtue signals ignores any actions that would actually help fix the problem, and doesn't even attempt to support people affected by the problem (because they don't actually care about it in the first place). It's just ironic that you state it outright like that

 

[Kay_Philosopher]

So there you go. You're completely aware that even the strictest countries don't have published data or things like "video evidence" that you keep asking for. Tons of people have explained this to you, in every which way it could be explained.



You've already said in past threads that you wanted to be a martyr for something to do with Christianity. It's very funny that you state your intention is to virtue signal though Virtue signaling literally means you don't have genuine personal convictions about the issue, the goal is to signal to other people that you're a good, moral person by picking an issue the majority of people agree on and talking about it repeatedly and loudly.

Meanwhile, a person who virtue signals ignores any actions that would actually help fix the problem, and doesn't even attempt to support people affected by the problem (because they don't actually care about it in the first place). It's just ironic that you state it outright like that

Yeah, but, I want to compile a cogent hypothesis for the likelihood of it occurring, you know? I am still quite befuddle if confession(admission of guilt) and indecisive evidence could make this an airtight case. You are right the issue is lack of data because I don't think something like this has been done or documented in our contemporary times.

I apologize for the misnomer for saying "virtue-signaling". I guess a better word to describe it would be to be a paragon of justice for everyone to look up to.

 

[Kay_Philosopher]

Thoughts?