TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,874
Normally, such a glib and flippant response deserves no response and I wouldn't dignify such a response (especially IRL). However, for the sake of discussion, informational, and educational value, I have thought about a response or at least some retort when one is faced with such a glib and flippant statement (not that I recommend people do so, but again, for the sake of knowledge). Such a statement isn't really an argument, but really a low-effort, bad faith attempt to shame and ridicule people that pro-lifers dislike. In some of the honk demonstration videos that TRTNLE (The Right To No Longer Exist) and even SHK (Stop Having Kids) whose focus is primarily anti-natalism, they have been the recipient of such ire from pro-lifers. I believe both organizations conducted themselves pretty well despite the errant, flippant, and glib statements that pro-lifers unload at them.
My response to such statements, of course, not based on logic since this isn't a logical argument, but more like an personal attack, therefore my reaction (should there be one) will be tailored towards that. So my rebuttal would then be something similar to: "Well you (pro-lifers) don't want to legalize peaceful means to do so, then you want the State (the government) to intervene against one's wishes. You might as well be telling a criminal that it is okay to commit crimes but just don't get caught! How ironic… Oh and also you (the pro-lifer) are a hypocrite because you want me (a pro-choicer) to choose death! It isn't even about living, it's all about your ego, your atavistic morals being protected, having dominance and control over others, and having your cake and eating it at the same time! So kindly go fuck yourself!"
Mind you such a harsh attack commands a harsh response as pro-lifers are all about "control" and less about living well. There is no line or boundary that they will not cross or any limit to their reach. Nor do they settle for any concessions or compromises as it's all about validating their egos, atavistic morals and worldview, and of course, being in charge of everyone, including those who don't share the same values and views as they are. Therefore, when pro-lifers (especially the vile ones) say such a glib statement, it really is just an attempt to gaslight, ridicule, and otherwise bully pro-choicers under the false notion that there exists a "real" choice when there isn't! They are also out of touch with reality as it shows because they (the pro-lifers) never really done their homework research (or even if they did, they deliberately ignore the facts that will expose or otherwise contradict their worldview), but I digress.
So with that said, do as you will with this information and while I don't recommend even wasting energy in responding to such glib and flippant remarks made by those "pro-lifers", at least you have some ammo to throw at them.
My response to such statements, of course, not based on logic since this isn't a logical argument, but more like an personal attack, therefore my reaction (should there be one) will be tailored towards that. So my rebuttal would then be something similar to: "Well you (pro-lifers) don't want to legalize peaceful means to do so, then you want the State (the government) to intervene against one's wishes. You might as well be telling a criminal that it is okay to commit crimes but just don't get caught! How ironic… Oh and also you (the pro-lifer) are a hypocrite because you want me (a pro-choicer) to choose death! It isn't even about living, it's all about your ego, your atavistic morals being protected, having dominance and control over others, and having your cake and eating it at the same time! So kindly go fuck yourself!"
Mind you such a harsh attack commands a harsh response as pro-lifers are all about "control" and less about living well. There is no line or boundary that they will not cross or any limit to their reach. Nor do they settle for any concessions or compromises as it's all about validating their egos, atavistic morals and worldview, and of course, being in charge of everyone, including those who don't share the same values and views as they are. Therefore, when pro-lifers (especially the vile ones) say such a glib statement, it really is just an attempt to gaslight, ridicule, and otherwise bully pro-choicers under the false notion that there exists a "real" choice when there isn't! They are also out of touch with reality as it shows because they (the pro-lifers) never really done their homework research (or even if they did, they deliberately ignore the facts that will expose or otherwise contradict their worldview), but I digress.
So with that said, do as you will with this information and while I don't recommend even wasting energy in responding to such glib and flippant remarks made by those "pro-lifers", at least you have some ammo to throw at them.