Darkover
Angelic
- Jul 29, 2021
- 4,739
- Procreation always entails a possibility of suffering of the child. It doesn't matter how small the probability of suffering is, the mere possibility suffices. To procreate is to gamble with someone's life.
- To say that pleasures and joys of life are worth some amount of suffering is fallacious for three reasons: a) What certainty do you have that the child will enjoy life more than he/she suffers? b) Pain and pleasure are not symmetrical. Any amount of pleasure does not compensate or 'Erase' pain. Would you be willing to experience 1 minute of best pleasure you can think of followed by 1 minute of worst pain imaginable? c) The non-existent are not deprived of any pleasure. They crave neither for being born, nor for the joys of the world. Does such a place exist where unborn babies cry out that they're being deprived of enjoying the joys this world has to offer?
- From 2c, it follows that it is impossible to bring a child to this world for its own sake. It's always for the sake of people who beget the child, which makes the child mere means to an end.
- What certainty do you have that the child would not inflict pain on other sentient beings?
- Procreating is allocating the existing resources to a newly created life rather than using those resources for betterment of children who already exist and don't have a home i.e. orphans and abandoned kids.
- Unfortunately, people are like animals because they get together and they're attracted to each other because of hormones and they start having babies without even thinking about it and then a year or two they don't even know each other and then they get a divorce and then the poor kids are from a broken home.