Dying Knight
Specialist
- Sep 17, 2023
- 329
I've read a lot about the method that implies usage of exit bag with inert gas, and I have an impression that this method is kinda overrated. Let's compare it with the more simple variant that doesn't require an inert gas:
1) Use of an inert gas makes the method less accessible: obtaining an appropriate hermetic bag with scarf or duct tape is a much more simple thing to do than obtaining a gas tank.
2) Use of an inert gas makes the method less reliable due to several factors:
- increased odds of appearing critical defects in the construction due to its complexity;
- a possible presence of life-saving amount of oxygen in the gas that is initially presumed to be oxygen-free;
- a possible lack of gas that may be used up too quickly;
- if the gas tank is spotted by people who know that the given person may suffer from depression, they may suspect something and then pay undesirable attention to the person's activity.
The most noticeable difference between the two methods is that an inert gas is supposed to make the process fully free of discomfort, while the simplified variant implies a suffering from hypercapnia.
So far I have no evidences that such a suffering may be strong. During my life I had a strong physical pain a lot of times, and I doubt that hypercapnia symptoms could somehow become more than just a moderate discomfort.
In my opinion, this moderate discomfort may be considered as an advantage of the method, because it serves as a good test for the will behind the decision to die. In case if the life is really bad and the person has strong intentions to end it, a moderate discomfort that lasts in 5 - 10 minutes shouldn't be a showstopper.
However, if the person is afraid of short suffering, this is a sign that the decision to die is probably too early and they should carefully rethink what they're going to do with their life. Luckily, interruption of the procedure with a bag may be done without negative consequences on the health, in contrast to many other methods like poisoning.
1) Use of an inert gas makes the method less accessible: obtaining an appropriate hermetic bag with scarf or duct tape is a much more simple thing to do than obtaining a gas tank.
2) Use of an inert gas makes the method less reliable due to several factors:
- increased odds of appearing critical defects in the construction due to its complexity;
- a possible presence of life-saving amount of oxygen in the gas that is initially presumed to be oxygen-free;
- a possible lack of gas that may be used up too quickly;
- if the gas tank is spotted by people who know that the given person may suffer from depression, they may suspect something and then pay undesirable attention to the person's activity.
The most noticeable difference between the two methods is that an inert gas is supposed to make the process fully free of discomfort, while the simplified variant implies a suffering from hypercapnia.
So far I have no evidences that such a suffering may be strong. During my life I had a strong physical pain a lot of times, and I doubt that hypercapnia symptoms could somehow become more than just a moderate discomfort.
In my opinion, this moderate discomfort may be considered as an advantage of the method, because it serves as a good test for the will behind the decision to die. In case if the life is really bad and the person has strong intentions to end it, a moderate discomfort that lasts in 5 - 10 minutes shouldn't be a showstopper.
However, if the person is afraid of short suffering, this is a sign that the decision to die is probably too early and they should carefully rethink what they're going to do with their life. Luckily, interruption of the procedure with a bag may be done without negative consequences on the health, in contrast to many other methods like poisoning.