TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,874
This is something that occurred to me in the past and again, which may explain why they act the way they do. Remember back when one was in primary school, or even when one was a kid and participated in various activities, whether it be sports, games, or any activity that is competitive? At any rate, so in primary school, I'm sure most students had tests, exams, and assessments throughout their education. During tests and exams, it is often closed-book, closed-notes (and in today's age, no smartphones, laptops, or anything that could be used to gain an unfair advantage). So when a student violates that rule, the student gets a failing grade (zero) on the exam as well as disciplinary action for 'cheating'. Similarly, when it comes to games or other competitions, be it sports, video games, and/or other extra curricular or specific-interest activities, if a player does something that is not allowed or prohibited by the rules, it is considered cheating. For example, if a player is not supposed to use one's own hands to catch the ball in soccer (or football depending on the country one is from) unless said player is the goal keeper/goalie, and they do, it becomes a penalty and the ball goes to the other team and with enough fouls or so, the offending player is removed from the game or sits in the bench (or just suspended for the remainder of the match or game). There are many other examples I could use, but these are the ones that come to mind.
Using the 'cheating' analogy, perhaps this could explain the mindset of yet why prolifers are so against people who CTB. If one was to see life as some involuntary game that nobody chose to play, but was imposed upon (which is a commonly accepted view), then pro-lifers (the other players in this involuntary game) see that anyone who wishes to CTB as irrational because it is considered 'cheating' or getting an unfair advantage by trying to exit this involuntary game before certain conditions (again, set by the collective pro-lifers themselves) are met. These conditions are often difficult and narrow to achieve, which are either: terminal illness (which there are even some prolifers who don't agree, especially religious ones) or of old age (like over the life expectancy of an adult, nearing 80's or 90's).
Note: I do NOT endorse nor condone the actions of prolifers, and their propagation of suffering is never ok with our tenets and values.
With that said, does anyone think this is probably the mindset of many prolifers?
Using the 'cheating' analogy, perhaps this could explain the mindset of yet why prolifers are so against people who CTB. If one was to see life as some involuntary game that nobody chose to play, but was imposed upon (which is a commonly accepted view), then pro-lifers (the other players in this involuntary game) see that anyone who wishes to CTB as irrational because it is considered 'cheating' or getting an unfair advantage by trying to exit this involuntary game before certain conditions (again, set by the collective pro-lifers themselves) are met. These conditions are often difficult and narrow to achieve, which are either: terminal illness (which there are even some prolifers who don't agree, especially religious ones) or of old age (like over the life expectancy of an adult, nearing 80's or 90's).
Note: I do NOT endorse nor condone the actions of prolifers, and their propagation of suffering is never ok with our tenets and values.
With that said, does anyone think this is probably the mindset of many prolifers?
Last edited: