
TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,240
I couldn't think of a better title for this thread, but I had a nagging thought over the years, with regards to a potential pattern I observed either IRL or through online platforms and spaces outside of SaSu. The thing I observed is where whenever someone is stressed or upset (for whatever reason or anything) and whenever venting to their loved ones, friends, or whomever, is that up until and perhaps even before the mention of "CTB" or so, maybe their audience (either mental health professionals, friends, family, etc.) inferred that the person speaking would end up CTB'ing? Even if said person did or didn't actually attempt (and succeed)?
Perhaps it is just that the normies, masses, and pro-lifers/anti-choicers etc., just do NOT like to have the knowledge of a potential CTB or even the mention/reminder of (either actual or potential) CTB? This is assuming that they never learned of the news ever of said person's fate. Or maybe "they (the normies, masses, pro-lifers etc.) know", but they just don't want to be 'notified, or mentioned' because then they would be compelled to act (hero complex, though I digress..)? Here is a scenario to put my point and premise into context:
Scenario A (when one mentions the unspoken part):
There is a person named 'L' and she has a friend named 'M'. They are alright friends, but not like close friends. So one day 'L' had some amazing event regardless of whatever it is. However, 'L' had a setback in life and sadly, she wasn't able to make it to the event (could be a concert, celebrity, or whatever 'L' fancies, again that detail is irrelevant). Then with such a disappointment and disaster, L said to M while being very upset, "Dammit! I missed that D event of my lifetime and waited for many many years because of X blah reason or cause! I'm so fucking angry and sad! (additional rants further…)" Then M tries to comfort L but to L, it felt like it was reductive or undermining and dismissive of L's upset and the gravity of how much the event meant to L herself. So M said "Don't worry L. You will get another chance at some other C blah event etc. It'll be just equally amazing!" L then said "If I don't get D event, in (insert future time), I will kms." Then suddenly M becomes startled and playing hero or becoming really overbearing "Are you okay L? CTB is not the answer!" and other things that just devolve which doesn't help L at all. Even worse, if M actively intervenes out of a 'hero savior complex' which wouldn't solve L's problems and may even make L's sentience worse!
Scenario B (when one does NOT mention the unspoken part):
So similar to Scenario A, but instead of mentioning the "unspoken part" to her friend, 'M', L said "Damn, I missed that event of my lifetime and waited for many many years because of X blah reason or cause! I'm very fucking angry and sad!". Then when M seeks to comfort L, L did not proceed further and maybe silently accepts the platitude (or at least appears to be). Even if M followed up, L did not allow M to recognize her 'true' intentions. So then when L actually follows through (at some future point in time, be it months, or year or so), then it may be a surprise shock to M, but maybe M isn't really shocked (hard to say, as it will depend on individual to individual).
In conclusion, I wrote this thread because throughout time I always pondered about whether or not the "unspoken part" about CTB was either known subconsciously by everyday people (normies, the masses, pro-lifers, and similar people alike), or maybe it's not known and they really do not want to know (nor would they really like to be 'surprised' unexpectedly either)? What are your thoughts on this, do you think that most people may already know about it but would just not like to be "reminded" and then feel compelled to act, or maybe they just do not know of the "unspoken part" and instead would never want to know as 'ignorance is bliss' to them is the most comforting reality for them?
Perhaps it is just that the normies, masses, and pro-lifers/anti-choicers etc., just do NOT like to have the knowledge of a potential CTB or even the mention/reminder of (either actual or potential) CTB? This is assuming that they never learned of the news ever of said person's fate. Or maybe "they (the normies, masses, pro-lifers etc.) know", but they just don't want to be 'notified, or mentioned' because then they would be compelled to act (hero complex, though I digress..)? Here is a scenario to put my point and premise into context:
Scenario A (when one mentions the unspoken part):
There is a person named 'L' and she has a friend named 'M'. They are alright friends, but not like close friends. So one day 'L' had some amazing event regardless of whatever it is. However, 'L' had a setback in life and sadly, she wasn't able to make it to the event (could be a concert, celebrity, or whatever 'L' fancies, again that detail is irrelevant). Then with such a disappointment and disaster, L said to M while being very upset, "Dammit! I missed that D event of my lifetime and waited for many many years because of X blah reason or cause! I'm so fucking angry and sad! (additional rants further…)" Then M tries to comfort L but to L, it felt like it was reductive or undermining and dismissive of L's upset and the gravity of how much the event meant to L herself. So M said "Don't worry L. You will get another chance at some other C blah event etc. It'll be just equally amazing!" L then said "If I don't get D event, in (insert future time), I will kms." Then suddenly M becomes startled and playing hero or becoming really overbearing "Are you okay L? CTB is not the answer!" and other things that just devolve which doesn't help L at all. Even worse, if M actively intervenes out of a 'hero savior complex' which wouldn't solve L's problems and may even make L's sentience worse!
Scenario B (when one does NOT mention the unspoken part):
So similar to Scenario A, but instead of mentioning the "unspoken part" to her friend, 'M', L said "Damn, I missed that event of my lifetime and waited for many many years because of X blah reason or cause! I'm very fucking angry and sad!". Then when M seeks to comfort L, L did not proceed further and maybe silently accepts the platitude (or at least appears to be). Even if M followed up, L did not allow M to recognize her 'true' intentions. So then when L actually follows through (at some future point in time, be it months, or year or so), then it may be a surprise shock to M, but maybe M isn't really shocked (hard to say, as it will depend on individual to individual).
In conclusion, I wrote this thread because throughout time I always pondered about whether or not the "unspoken part" about CTB was either known subconsciously by everyday people (normies, the masses, pro-lifers, and similar people alike), or maybe it's not known and they really do not want to know (nor would they really like to be 'surprised' unexpectedly either)? What are your thoughts on this, do you think that most people may already know about it but would just not like to be "reminded" and then feel compelled to act, or maybe they just do not know of the "unspoken part" and instead would never want to know as 'ignorance is bliss' to them is the most comforting reality for them?