• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
Darkover

Darkover

Archangel
Jul 29, 2021
5,649
In today's world, the difference between perception and reality has never been more extreme—especially when it comes to wealth. We throw around words like millionaire and billionaire so casually that their true meaning gets lost. But take a moment to do the math: if you earned $100,000 per year, completely tax-free, it would take you 10 years to become a millionaire. It would take you 10,000 years—ten entire millennia—to become a billionaire. And yet, a handful of individuals today possess not one, but tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars.

This concentration of wealth would be shocking on its own. But it's made worse by the reality that billions of people lack basic necessities—food, clean water, shelter, medical care—while these titanic fortunes grow unchecked. This isn't just inequality; it's structural injustice hardwired into our economic system. And to fully grasp it, we must understand the deeper machinery of modern wealth and money creation.

The Mirage of Billionaire Wealth

The first misconception is that billionaires sit on mountains of cash. They don't. The vast majority of their wealth is not liquid—it's tied up in assets, primarily corporate stock. That wealth is determined not by what they physically own or spend, but by what the market believes their holdings are worth.

Take Elon Musk. His net worth can swing by billions of dollars in a single day, often based on nothing more than public perception. If Tesla stock dips after a controversial tweet, his net worth drops accordingly—without a dollar actually changing hands. This isn't real money in any practical sense; it's a speculative valuation.

But even if this wealth is abstract, the power it grants is very real. These asset-rich elites can:

Borrow against their holdings at extremely low interest rates—something ordinary people can't do.

Fund political campaigns, shaping legislation in their favor.

Buy media companies and control public narratives.

Avoid taxes through loopholes like holding (instead of selling) stock, thereby avoiding capital gains tax altogether.

Their influence stretches far beyond the numbers in their portfolios. They have the tools to shape economies, manipulate markets, and direct society, all while remaining largely untouched by the rules that govern everyone else.
The Engine of Debt

To understand how this is possible, we must examine how money itself is created in our current system.

Most people assume that banks lend out money they already have. But under fractional reserve banking, this isn't true. When you take out a loan, the bank doesn't hand you pre-existing money—it creates that money on the spot, digitally. This newly created money enters the economy the moment it's spent. In fact, over 90% of all money in existence today exists purely as numbers on screens. It is not backed by gold or silver, or any physical commodity. It is backed only by trust—trust in the bank, trust in the government, trust in the economy.

But here's the fatal flaw: every loan must be repaid with interest. That means you owe more than you borrowed. Yet the money to pay the interest doesn't exist—at least not initially. It must be created by someone else taking out another loan. In other words, the only way to keep the system functioning is through ever-increasing debt. If people stopped borrowing, the economy would grind to a halt. Defaults would skyrocket. Money would vanish from circulation. This is not a fringe conspiracy—it is a well-documented feature of mainstream economic models.

This debt-driven cycle is why modern economies pursue endless growth. It isn't about improving lives or meeting human needs—it's about avoiding collapse. Growth is not optional; it's a systemic requirement. Without it, the house of cards begins to fall.
The Origins and Fragility of Money

Human societies didn't always work this way. In the earliest economies, people bartered—trading eggs for shoes, or grain for cloth. But barter was messy and inefficient. So humans developed shared tokens of value: salt, shells, gold, silver. These commodities eventually led to coins and paper money—IOUs backed by real resources.

But today's money—called fiat money—is different. It has no intrinsic value. It is not redeemable for gold or silver. It has value only because governments declare it legal tender, and people accept it in exchange for goods and services. This faith-based system works—until it doesn't. When too much money is printed, or trust erodes, currencies can collapse. History is full of such examples, from Weimar Germany to modern-day Venezuela.

Even the act of debasing currency—reducing its value by inflating the money supply or diminishing the purity of metal coins—has been around for centuries. Today, debasement happens digitally: central banks inject trillions into the system, diluting the purchasing power of existing money and driving inflation that disproportionately harms the poor.
Power Without Accountability

The end result is a system where billionaires benefit from asset inflation, low-interest borrowing, and political access, while average people drown in debt, struggle with rising costs, and face job insecurity and stagnant wages.

We live in a world where:

Wealth is abstract but wields concrete power.

Money is digital, but debt is real.

Growth is required, even when it destroys the planet.

Trust is essential, yet continuously undermined by corruption and inequality.

We are told this system is natural, inevitable—even moral. But that's a lie.

When one person can own as much as entire nations while millions starve, the system is not just flawed—it is fundamentally unethical.


Conclusion

It's time to stop romanticizing billionaires and start questioning the system that creates them. Wealth this concentrated is not a sign of genius or merit—it is a symptom of structural design, built on debt, powered by illusion, and maintained through exploitation. Until we confront the nature of money, debt, and power, we will remain trapped in a rigged game, where most people lose so a few can win endlessly.

We don't need minor reforms. We need to rethink the entire architecture.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
  • Informative
Reactions: dahamfgf, opro111, tiredoflife2 and 6 others
W

whywere

Illuminated
Jun 26, 2020
3,995
If the human race sticks around long enough and does not breed, pollute, or blow ourselves up, like in sci-fi movies and tv shows, money, collecting it, hopefully greed and self-centeredness will be of a bygone era.

I have all my life, like everyone seen so much darn greed, backstabbing and anything and everything associated with money that it makes me sick.

I just hope and pray that evolution takes greed and the like out of the DNA pool.

Walter
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: Carrot, Darkover and darksouls
Pluto

Pluto

Cat Extremist
Dec 27, 2020
6,759
top-drawer-jenkins-put-the-box-in-the-top-drawer
 
  • Yay!
  • Like
Reactions: tiredoflife2, Forever Sleep, darksouls and 2 others
ginko0

ginko0

To be or not to be
May 8, 2025
199
We should also become aware that billionaires do not become billionaires through simple "effort and luck", but by a combination of deceiving, tax-avoidance, exploitation of the system, the laws and of workers, or inheritance of billionaires who did that in the past. It is never moral to be a billionaire.
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: whywere
SVEN

SVEN

I Wish I'd Been a Jester Too.
Apr 3, 2023
2,802
If the human race sticks around long enough and does not breed, pollute, or blow ourselves up, like in sci-fi movies and tv shows, money, collecting it, hopefully greed and self-centeredness will be of a bygone era.

I have all my life, like everyone seen so much darn greed, backstabbing and anything and everything associated with money that it makes me sick.

I just hope and pray that evolution takes greed and the like out of the DNA pool.

Walter
I fear it's not working thus far, Walter.
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: whywere
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

🎂
Oct 15, 2023
2,421
Many people mistakenly believe Musk has $400,000,000,000 sitting in his Martian bank account. Not quite how it works.

There is a thing called multiples. I call Elon Musk Multiple Man. When you have a business, your business has a certain amount of profits over the last year. Let's say my business made $5 in profit last year. And the price the market is willing to pay for my business is $500. So I made $5 last year and the market is valuing my business at $500. My price to earnings is 100. Thats the multiple, price to earrings ratio, it's a multiple of earnings. $5 X 100 ‎ = $500.00 valuation. That is the concept of a multiple. Let's look at SpaceX's profits. His aerospace company grew from operating on a net loss of revenue of $1.45 billion in 2019 to an operating profit of about $3 billion on $9 billion in revenue in 2023. Thats actually impressive profitability. So he's got a 33% operating margin. Let's just assume since I don't know the debt margin, let's see what multiple SpaceX is trading at on operating earnings. Let's look at the supposed value of SpaceX, $400 billion. So the market is basically saying we're gonna pay $400 billion for a company that had trailing operating earnings in 2023 of $3 billion. The price to operating profits is 116. A multiple of 116 which by the way the multiple would be higher assuming he had interest and tax expenses that he's paying for his business venture and he probably does. So we could even say the multiple could be 130. But a high multiple represents a company that is growing earnings rapidity. Usually a company that has a very high multiple the market is projecting that company's gonna grow profits significantly in the future. It trades at a high multiple. The trailing earnings were small but the future earnings are gonna be big so the market is willing to pay a premium on those prior earnings. So if you're a genius at marketing your business, the market will believe you unfortunately and assign a high multiple to your business on the expectation that you're gonna deliver on your promise of future profits. So Elon Musk is multiple man. What he does is make grandiose promises about the future. "I'm gonna have robo-taxis, I'm gonna have Optimus Prime, AI, FSD, everything. And the profits are gonna be insane." The market buys it and the collective wisdom of the market assigns his companies extremely high multiples. Tesla's stock - even when earnings flatlined, the stock was up 74% for the year. The market capitalization is ~1.1 trillion. The PE is around ~200. The price that the market is willing to pay for the last year of earnings is ~$200 for every dollar of trailing earnings. And the market is willing to pay $200 for one dollar of next year's expected earnings. The market can easily double the multiple on Tesla. We can see Tesla at $1,000. I'm not joking. Anything is possible. You'd be surprised how big some bubbles can get. Musk can become a trillionaire if the market gets exuberant enough to assign the multiples that would require him to become a trillionaire. His wealth is not in cash. His wealth is in equity valuation. And as long as you can convince the market to massively assign high multiples to your company, you could become a trillionaire. It's call exuberance and bubbles are crazy.
 
  • Hugs
  • Informative
Reactions: Pluto and whywere