• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
D

delayedcactus

Member
Nov 27, 2023
86
I came across this article recently and I think it's pretty remarkable how someone is able to survive a 91% methemoglobin level when levels above 70% are usually fatal. Just goes to show if the body doesn't want to quit, it won't.

Anyway, just curious what others make of this article. Any guesses as to what biological factors make this patient unique? I don't think they divulge those details unfortunately. All that's stated is that she had no health conditions prior to the attempt.

Yes, this is for pesticide poisoning but the resulting medical condition is the same as with SN.

 
D

Deleted member 65988

Guest
No, that doesn't mean that the body won't just "quit". 91% Met-hb levels are really, really lethal, what saved the patient in the case can be isolated down to several reasons, some of which weren't divulged in the medical article you've presented. Chances are that the patients body had a greater natural mechanism to reduce methemoglobin back to hemoglobin, which involves the enzyme methemoglobin reductase, its the same as a case of someone taking 60g of sn but not ctbing, there are reasons for why this happens, reaching 91% of Met-hb is really rare since even levels past 60 have been fatal. Anyway, this article has been discussed before already on this forum much like others so you'll find em.
 
D

delayedcactus

Member
Nov 27, 2023
86
No, that doesn't mean that the body won't just "quit". 91% Met-hb levels are really, really lethal, what saved the patient in the case can be isolated down to several reasons, some of which weren't divulged in the medical article you've presented. Chances are that the patients body had a greater natural mechanism to reduce methemoglobin back to hemoglobin, which involves the enzyme methemoglobin reductase, its the same as a case of someone taking 60g of sn but not ctbing, there are reasons for why this happens, reaching 91% of Met-hb is really rare since even levels past 60 have been fatal. Anyway, this article has been discussed before already on this forum much like others so you'll find em.
I see - I know you said this is rare but strange health things have been known to happen in my life and this is one place where I cannot take that risk. I wish there was some way to know if you're part of that 1% that has magical fairy genes lol.
 
D

Deleted member 65988

Guest
I see - I know you said this is rare but strange health things have been known to happen in my life and this is one place where I cannot take that risk. I wish there was some way to know if you're part of that 1% that has magical fairy genes lol.
Fine, if that's how you feel then so be it.

Having read enough about Methemoglobinemia and how articles raise the alarm of how deadly it is, I'm fairly certain most cases don't even reach the upper levels of 80%+ Met-hb levels.
 

Similar threads

whitefeather
Replies
5
Views
710
Suicide Discussion
urgent
U
wheelsonthebus
Replies
17
Views
2K
Suicide Discussion
looking4partner
L
DarkRange55
Replies
1
Views
200
Politics & Philosophy
Catscratch
C