• UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.

  • Hey Guest,

    Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.

    This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.

    In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].

    Read our statement here:

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC): 34HyDHTvEhXfPfb716EeEkEHXzqhwtow1L
    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8
Soapie

Soapie

I hope we all can heal from this
Mar 26, 2021
85
If SS gets taken down, something else will take its place. If that gets taken down, another site will pop up. Suicidal people will always be looking for information and support for their suicidality. It's just the nature of mental illness. I understand people who want to get rid of pro-choice resources. I really really do. The idea that folks are choosing to die and supporting that choice for others is a hard pill to swallow. It's incredibly grim. For those who have come here from the NYT article though, I want to ask you: do you think SS is the problem? Or Lost All Hope? Or Peaceful Pill? Because I'm not going to lie, I think it's very naive to think it is. I feel like NYT is looking at this from a very backwards perspective. I read the article, and they very much seem to be adamant that banning these sites would save lives. It absolutely would not. People would find the info somewhere else if this site didn't exist. What WOULD save more lives is putting the energy they're using to get SS banned to actually fund and promote good mental health services that can give people the resources to live good lives. Advocate for public mental health care, destigmatize suicidal thoughts, work to uplift and empower the lower class. NYT is a huge entity. They have the power to truly help, but they're focusing on the completely wrong thing. People are here because they have nowhere else to turn. Wanna prevent people from coming here? Help give them somewhere else to fucking turn instead of just belittling them for doing their best with what they have.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
  • Love
Reactions: Marktheghost, insipixiecat, WrongPlaceWrongTime and 6 others
D

Deleted member 8579

Enlightened
Apr 28, 2021
1,323
Shutting some website down is cheaper and more convenient than doing any of the things you propose, and afterwards they can pat themselves on the back for "having done something good".
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Circles, WrongPlaceWrongTime, ihatemylife and 4 others
Sherri

Sherri

Archangel
Sep 28, 2020
13,794
We def can't count on FB everything there is censorship. Marquis is a smart guy. This is not the first time this happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Circles, NearlyIrrelevantCake and ghost_
T

Ta555

Enlightened
Aug 31, 2021
1,317
If SS gets taken down, something else will take its place. If that gets taken down, another site will pop up. Suicidal people will always be looking for information and support for their suicidality. It's just the nature of mental illness. I understand people who want to get rid of pro-choice resources. I really really do. The idea that folks are choosing to die and supporting that choice for others is a hard pill to swallow. It's incredibly grim. For those who have come here from the NYT article though, I want to ask you: do you think SS is the problem? Or Lost All Hope? Or Peaceful Pill? Because I'm not going to lie, I think it's very naive to think it is. I feel like NYT is looking at this from a very backwards perspective. I read the article, and they very much seem to be adamant that banning these sites would save lives. It absolutely would not. People would find the info somewhere else if this site didn't exist. What WOULD save more lives is putting the energy they're using to get SS banned to actually fund and promote good mental health services that can give people the resources to live good lives. Advocate for public mental health care, destigmatize suicidal thoughts, work to uplift and empower the lower class. NYT is a huge entity. They have the power to truly help, but they're focusing on the completely wrong thing. People are here because they have nowhere else to turn. Wanna prevent people from coming here? Help give them somewhere else to fucking turn instead of just belittling them for doing their best with what they have.
You say 'It's just the nature of mental illness.' I don't agree that suicidal thoughts are a sign of mental illness, at least not in a lot of cases. Suicide is a very rational solution to suffering that cannot be ameliorated. Wanting to CTB is not necessarily a sign of mental illness but a logical solution.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: BeautifulMosaics, bed, ihatemylife and 1 other person
Sherri

Sherri

Archangel
Sep 28, 2020
13,794
You say 'It's just the nature of mental illness.' I don't agree that suicidal thoughts are a sign of mental illness, at least not in a lot of cases. Suicide is a very rational solution to suffering that cannot be ameliorated. Wanting to CTB is not necessarily a sign of mental illness but a logical solution.
If CTB it's legal in some countries why can't we have our opinion also right?
 
Soapie

Soapie

I hope we all can heal from this
Mar 26, 2021
85
You say 'It's just the nature of mental illness.' I don't agree that suicidal thoughts are a sign of mental illness, at least not in a lot of cases. Suicide is a very rational solution to suffering that cannot be ameliorated. Wanting to CTB is not necessarily a sign of mental illness but a logical solution.
That's a good point!! I guess you could say it's the nature of suicidality, or the nature of suffering
 
I

ihatemylife

Student
Jul 14, 2021
140
Yomental illness.u say 'It's just the nature of mental illness.' I don't agree that suicidal thoughts are a sign of mental illness, at least not in a lot of cases. Suicide is a very rational solution to suffering that cannot be ameliorated. Wanting to CTB is not necessarily a sign of mental illness but a logical solution.
In my opinion wanting to stick around till the decrepit age of 100,, wearing a diaper, getting slapped in the face in some nursing home in this shit hole of a world is a sign of mental illness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ta555 and WrongPlaceWrongTime

Similar threads

F
Replies
1
Views
174
Offtopic
LittleMagician
LittleMagician
Catchingdabus27
Replies
0
Views
103
Suicide Discussion
Catchingdabus27
Catchingdabus27
F
Replies
23
Views
719
Suicide Discussion
cemeteryismyhome
cemeteryismyhome