FuneralCry
Just wanting some peace
- Sep 24, 2020
- 37,187
It's so wrong and insane to me, to deny people the option of the most ideal way to exit, it's painful the fact that such a peaceful exit exists yet we are not allowed to legally obtain it. There is something so wonderful in the thought of a peaceful suicide, one that prevents unnecessary struggle and torment and instantly removes all of life's problems, it's the true solution and nothing else could ever solve what is the true problem which is life itself. When suicide is this difficult it means that this existence is prison like and it's like we are being punished all for being forced into a world that we never asked to be in, because of the selfish decisions of others.
Why should existence be an obligation, this idea has always seemed insane to me that we must carry on existing at all costs, even if such a thing causes us to be tortured so extremely. It's irrational to claim that suicide is wrong as there are no disadvantages to being dead, instead there is only the overwhelmingly positive fact that whatever this existence has burdened with will be gone. So therefore there is nothing to justify denying people the option of N. I've always known that suicide is the right thing but yet this feels like such an impossibility. With all the torture and endless pain, and just the tedious nature of existing, having N would be ideal for people, but yet there is none. Instead we are expected to just suffer or risk some kind of damage and/or complications in finding a way to leave ourselves.
To deny N is extreme cruelty which shouldn't be seen as being acceptable. Those who wish to leave deserve compassion towards what they go through and even those who hold pro suffering beliefs and wish to deny the cruel reality of this existence would likely wish for some someday. There is no benefit to existing in a world where as time goes on things will just get worse for us and then we will inevitably deteriorate, there's nothing desirable and nothing to be gained for this. People spend a lot of their lives trying to deal with whatever this existence has burdened them with and trying to reduce suffering, but the tragedy lies in the fact that the most peaceful way to solve everything is denied from us.
Why should existence be an obligation, this idea has always seemed insane to me that we must carry on existing at all costs, even if such a thing causes us to be tortured so extremely. It's irrational to claim that suicide is wrong as there are no disadvantages to being dead, instead there is only the overwhelmingly positive fact that whatever this existence has burdened with will be gone. So therefore there is nothing to justify denying people the option of N. I've always known that suicide is the right thing but yet this feels like such an impossibility. With all the torture and endless pain, and just the tedious nature of existing, having N would be ideal for people, but yet there is none. Instead we are expected to just suffer or risk some kind of damage and/or complications in finding a way to leave ourselves.
To deny N is extreme cruelty which shouldn't be seen as being acceptable. Those who wish to leave deserve compassion towards what they go through and even those who hold pro suffering beliefs and wish to deny the cruel reality of this existence would likely wish for some someday. There is no benefit to existing in a world where as time goes on things will just get worse for us and then we will inevitably deteriorate, there's nothing desirable and nothing to be gained for this. People spend a lot of their lives trying to deal with whatever this existence has burdened them with and trying to reduce suffering, but the tragedy lies in the fact that the most peaceful way to solve everything is denied from us.