• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
Topaz111

Topaz111

I can feel this body in revolt
Mar 9, 2026
42
I've read somewhere here that SN has relatively low risk of long term side effects in cases of failed attempts, but I'm kinda confused about it?
SN causes death due to hypoxia right? But so does hanging and strangulation, so why is SN lower risk? From what I understand hanging and strangulation causes hypoxia due to physically cutting off blood flow to the brain by compressing the carotid arteries whereas SN causes hypoxia due to chemically altering your blood's ability to give oxygen to your tissues.
However, in both cases the result is the same, no oxygen to the brain. When brain has no oxygen the neurons begin to die which can cause brain damage if someone is "saved".
So why would the risk of brain damage from SN be lower than that of other hypoxia methods?
Am I missing something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTwelthRootOfTwo
TheTwelthRootOfTwo

TheTwelthRootOfTwo

Member
Mar 16, 2026
77
Yeah, I don't understand that either. SN is basically liquid Carbon Monoxide, which in itself can have massive failure repercussions.
 
Upvote 0
Kayla

Kayla

quetiapine <3
Dec 23, 2024
297
I survived SN and have injuries to my brain.
 
  • Hugs
  • Love
Reactions: sadgirl1997 and weewillywoo
Upvote 0
S

shatteredcrystal

Preferably me, partially not, probably in between.
Apr 8, 2024
29
From my understanding, SN is lethal even if you just take a little, and rescuing is rather hard. Giving you concentrated oxygen does not help much because the iron ions in your blood are oxidised. (The medics would probably know what is wrong when they see you, Still, methylene blue, the substance used to cure it, is not very accessible.)
Yet failures can happen, and in those cases, things wouldn't be too good. This is probably the part I fear most since I live in a place where people give way to ambulances (which is normally a good thing lol)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Topaz111
Upvote 1
E

Endisclose

Specialist
Oct 23, 2023
352
My understanding is, if they want to save someone, they have to do so before the hypoxia has reached a certain threshold. Beyond a certain point, despite the best efforts, the person can't be saved and the doctors would know that.

SN is pretty fast acting like 40 mins at the standard dosage, I believe. That leaves a pretty short window for the critical threshold to be crossed. The way I see it, it is that it is like a switch. Either one makes it through or doesn't - with no major problems, being free to try again. That is what makes the method preferable, I believe, for a lot of people.
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: Dante_
Upvote 0