It's up to me how I interpret the links??
I gonna review here:
1. In the OP, you specifically said: "
As per medical literature, isn't SN ingestion followed by painful
seizures?"
2. In post 6, you said: "
I was just reviewing the medical literature on suicide via SN. Throughout, there is mention of vomiting and
seizures."
3. I asked for links, you linked an SS comment that was an unsubstantiated quote,
not medical literature.
3. When I kept pushing your for the medical literature you'd just been reviewing, you finally provided three links.
Only one of them mentioned convulsions or seizures. And one of them was
fiction published in a medical journal (and that was not the one article that mentioned convulsions or seizures!).
Summary:
You've used a lot of manipulative moves throughout this thread. I don't know what your agenda is and it's doesn't matter, what matters is that you use manipulative tactics such as evasion, misdirection and gaslighting (creating an alternative reality than the very obvious reality) and are therefore have proven to me as far as this subject is concerned to be untrustworthy. Sorry if that's unsettling. Cheers back!