Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
Discussionsky dive
Thread starterx~Sophia~x
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I've been skydiving (albeit many years ago) and yes it's possible. Depending on the safety features, it's likely that cutting of ropes/wires is unnecessary (one is able to detach the main chute in case it gets tangled-up... and then just not deploy the reserve/backup chute). I'm talking about an "accelerated free fall" jump... assume "static line" is similar, but I could be wrong.
But, to get to the point where you could actually do it... you have to go through a lot of training... hours and hours with an instructor on the ground (and they do screen you).
BUT, it would be a terrible thing for someone to do that to the instructor (perhaps they'd even lose their livelihood). Probably much worse than a train engineer hitting and killing someone. PLEASE FOR GOODNESS SAKE DON'T!
Last edited:
Reactions:
self.destractive, x~Sophia~x, Pookie and 1 other person
I've been skydiving (albeit many years ago) and yes it's possible. Depending on the safety features, it's likely that cutting of ropes/wires is unnecessary (one is able to detach the main chute in case it gets tangled-up... and then just not deploy the reserve/backup chute). I'm talking about an "accelerated free fall" jump... assume "static line" is similar, but I could be wrong.
But, to get to the point where you could actually do it... you have to go through a lot of training... hours and hours with an instructor on the ground (and they do screen you).
BUT, it would be a terrible for someone to do that to the instructor (perhaps they'd even lose their livelihood). Probably much worse than a train engineer hitting and killing someone. PLEASE FOR GOODNESS SAKE DON'T!
Why would the instructor lose their livelihood? If they carried out all the required screening, it would be impossible to suspect my motive.
I don't believe it's worse than a train driver hitting a suicidal person... the instructor would still be in the plane and wouldn't witness any of it.
If even just one beginner student dies, it greatly affects their reputation. They were responsible to make sure you knew how to do everything correctly... and you die?!? Records are kept. Believe me it is a very, VERY bad thing!
The instructor really gets to know you... personally. And, they are responsible for your safety... personally. They (personally) and their school will likely be sued by your relatives.
Depending on how it goes down, there's probably always going to be a question in their mind if your death was their screw-up or an intentional ctb.
Train drivers usually don't face anything so personal, unknown, and the same liability.
No that's wrong. Beginners have to do many of their first dives with 1) the instructor physically connected or holding-on to you, then 2) jumping with you (they don't pull their chute until yours is well deployed).
It would take MANY full days of training (perhaps 20 jumps & a lot of money) before you got to go completely solo.
It's possible after you do all your tandem jumps so you can get to jump on your own. However I have heard several stories of people surviving this landing on grass. It's happened a few times in Florida
Reactions:
x~Sophia~x
x~Sophia~x
Always give 100% - unless you’re donating blood.
If even just one beginner student dies, it greatly affects their reputation. They were responsible to make sure you knew how to do everything correctly... and you die?!? Records are kept. Believe me it is a very, VERY bad thing!
The instructor really gets to know you... personally. And, they are responsible for your safety... personally. They (personally) and their school will likely be sued by your relatives.
Depending on how it goes down, there's probably always going to be a question in their mind if your death was their screw-up or an intentional ctb.
Train drivers usually don't face anything so personal, unknown, and the same liability.
No that's wrong. Beginners have to do many of their first dives with 1) the instructor physically connected or holding-on to you, then 2) jumping with you (they don't pull their chute until yours is well deployed).
It would take MANY full days of training (perhaps 20 jumps & a lot of money) before you got to go completely solo.
It's possible after you do all your tandem jumps so you can get to jump on your own. However I have heard several stories of people surviving this landing on grass. It's happened a few times in Florida
If possible, isn't it better not to chance hurting someone else? In a way, one's last act on Earth becomes saying "fuck you"... to someone who was genuinely trying to do good by you.
Knowing what I know about how it works... After all the training and getting to know an instructor.., I would find it virtually impossible to intentionally hurt someone like that.
If possible, isn't it better not to chance hurting someone else? In a way, one's last act on Earth becomes saying "fuck you"... to someone who was genuinely trying to do good by you.
Knowing what I know about how it works... After all the training and getting to know an instructor.., I would find it virtually impossible to intentionally hurt someone like that.
That would be MUCH better... you can get to a point where you're totally solo and you're the only one responsible for the accident. You could even control location much more and perhaps even do it over wilderness where your body can really disappear.
But again, there's tons of training to get to that point & even with used equipment... probably talking at least $5,000 minimum.
Both these methods require crazy amounts of determination, time, and money. BUT BOTH ARE A LOT OF FUN & MAY IMPROVE YOUR SPIRITS SO MUCH THAT YOU NO LONGER WANT TO CTB (so there could be that side-effect too).
Reactions:
less than and x~Sophia~x
x~Sophia~x
Always give 100% - unless you’re donating blood.
That would be MUCH better... you can get to a point where you're totally solo and you're the only one responsible for the accident. You could even control location much more and perhaps even do it over wilderness where your body can really disappear.
But again, there's tons of training to get to that point & even with used equipment... probably talking at least $5,000 minimum.
Both these methods require crazy amounts of determination, time, and money. BUT BOTH ARE A LOT OF FUN & MAY IMPROVE YOUR SPIRITS SO MUCH THAT YOU NO LONGER WANT TO CTB (so there could be that side-effect too).
Or hang-gliding... In either case, you could dive... build-up a tremendous amount of speed (much more than freefall) and be guaranteed to obliterate oneself on any hard object... ~like an airplane crash without the airplane.
Both these also fall under similar rules as paragliding... so you're the only one really at fault/to blame.
It takes a lot of tandem skydives before you can go on your own, and even then you still have a group jumping with you. If something went wrong, they'd be trying to catch you.
And with the tandem ones in my experience you are strapped to the instructor when you get in the plane so there's no hoodwinking them by jumping out first.
For something that seems so inherently dangerous, there are a remarkable number of safeguards that make dying from it extremely unusual. And in most cases if someone dies, the school is closed permanently.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.