• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

🎂
Oct 15, 2023
2,421
https://scitechdaily.com/physicists-have-mathematically-proven-the-universe-is-not-a-simulation/

I'm disappointed in Krauss - he used to be pretty good.
What they have shown is that one cannot simulate our universe by just using algorithms that cannot handle indeterminate states. That is not the same as showing that the universe cannot be simulated and thus cannot be a simulation. They even simulated their key feature of our universe, its indeterminacy, by thinking through some of the implications of the universe's indeterminacy, contradicting their own conclusion.
 
phantasmagoria

phantasmagoria

Member
Nov 17, 2025
41
I don't know enough about physics to understand what you said, but also couldn't the "proof" they found be simulated or faked in some way by the programmers?
 
Dejected 55

Dejected 55

Visionary
May 7, 2025
2,875
The whole thing about being unable to prove a negative really means more than people think.

It would be far easier to prove we are in a simulation than to prove we aren't. IF we in fact are in a simulation, you'd only need one repeatable thing you could prove to conclude it... But to prove we are not in a simulation requires so many things to be proven that it would be impossible.

You just can't prove a negative because you have to disprove every possible exception in order to prove the negative. If even one thing can't be disproven, then you haven't proven the negative.

I don't know why anyone would even try to pass off such a thing.

And, of by the way, IF we are in a simulation the only way to really be sure would be to be able to get outside the simulation. It is super hard to prove you live in a fishbowl without being able to get outside of the fishbowl.
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
6
Views
556
Offtopic
confusedandstupid
confusedandstupid
DarkRange55
Replies
0
Views
481
Politics & Philosophy
DarkRange55
DarkRange55
DarkRange55
Replies
1
Views
600
Politics & Philosophy
Catscratch
C