• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
paredler

paredler

Student
Jul 31, 2022
191
The scandinavian countries have a very comprehensive welfare system, but they're still capitalist, with class disparities, wage gaps and people who are considered "poor". The scandinavian countries are capitalism with good welfare, but it's still capitalism. Theoretically, one day these states can run out of capital and will no longer have enough to asist their people. It's not like these countries work on a completely different economic system, it's not like they organize their society in a completely different way than the U.S. The only difference is how much welfare assistance is there, but it's assistance.e it's not like poor people manage to live on their own without government help, they are dependant on external help in a free market economy. By the way, even though the scandinavian countries managed to eliminate homelessness completely, they didn't do it by building more houses, but by different ways. The country doesn't necessarily produce more of the things that are in scarcity are necessary for survival. They government just buys it for them. Also, there's no direct workplace democracy or employee empowerment. If there is a democracy in the workplace, it's a very indirect one. Its the government assistance that allows you to have some bargaining power against your workplace, but it's not like you "own the means of production".