i've graphed some data points per 1000 pages, and it seems to be that there's an avarage of a +27.5 increase. there's a 30 replies for page, so 27.5 out of 30 replies are increasers (91.6667%) and 2.5 out of 30 are decreasers (0.0833%)
-
Hey Guest,
We wanted to share a quick update with the community.
Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.
👉 View the ledger hereOver the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):Ethereum (ETH):Monero (XMR):
i've graphed some data points per 1000 pages, and it seems to be that there's an avarage of a +27.5 increase. there's a 30 replies for page, so 27.5 out of 30 replies are increasers (91.6667%) and 2.5 out of 30 are decreasers (0.0833%)
EvisceratedJester
|| What Else Could I Be But a Jester ||
- Oct 21, 2023
- 5,158
Your results look pretty different from mine
Would you mind explaining how you got these results?
there's probably alot of deviation, but i don't know how to autiomatically scrape posts automatically
Anonymousa
Get me Out
- Sep 21, 2024
- 2,395
you probably thought of cock too much when you were trying to get your results as so your analysis became less accurate. /jokeLast edited:https://www.desmos.com/calculator/upthfijkjy here's the graph if you want to edit itSimilar threads
- noname223
- Politics & Philosophy
Politics & Philosophyfujikofujiko
