
Corovaner
Я в душе дегенерат, просто это вам не видно.
- Apr 15, 2025
- 144
Do you believe in quantum immortality? If it's true, CTB becomes far less scareful. Just a chance to overwrite all your mistakes.
Perhaps I get this theory wrong, but it comforts me a lot. In the meantime I've got my SN, metoclopramide and patacetamol. It is strange, but I don't feel fear, only excitement. Plan to do it in august.I don't quite understand how quantum immortality relates to being able to overwrite my mistakes, if I remember correctly, that's not what this theory is about.
I do believe in some form of immortality/eternal return, though. I don't think memories and personality are preserved, but I see the existence and feeling of Self as continuous and everlasting. You can only experience something by existing => you cannot experience non-existence => your entire subjective experience consists only of existence.
I'm sorry that things turned out this way for you, but I'm glad that you were able to find your solace, it's worth a lot. I also dream that I will have another chance to get a good ending. Living this life over and over again in different variations is probably one of the scenarios I like the most. If I were sure that this is the case, I would immediately go to find out if I would be more lucky with my health next time.Perhaps I get this theory wrong, but it comforts me a lot. In the meantime I've got my SN, metoclopramide and patacetamol. It is strange, but I don't feel fear, only excitement. Plan to do it in august.
Like I have waited this moment my whole life. Just inevitability.
I have health issues too, it's my main reason. It was bearable, but in 7th february of this year it became not cause of stupid nurse's mistake. By 10 june I will try to fix this, but my attempt will fail more likely. Nah, better be gone in my 30, than in 50 being disabled subhuman.I'm sorry that things turned out this way for you, but I'm glad that you were able to find your solace, it's worth a lot. I also dream that I will have another chance to get a good ending. Living this life over and over again in different variations is probably one of the scenarios I like the most. If I were sure that this is the case, I would immediately go to find out if I would be more lucky with my health next time.
I understand it, but idea of re-live life and erase mistakes obsesses and comforts me at the same time. This theory gives me something like that. I don't feel fear, thanks to it.You have probably misunderstood this concept.
It requires a system in a superposition, like a qubit, and a device which is entangled with that system and which will kill you instantly, so that you won't have any subseqquent conscious experience. Regular suicide methods do not offer this.
However, this will not save you from biological ageing and death, so this is not really immortality. You would only be "immortal" in the sense that you survive each iteration of quantum suicide.
Moreover, this experiment can only work if many-worlds interpretation (MWI) is correct, but practical implementation could still be impossible.
If MWI is correct, we can speculate that there is at least one branch in which your consciousness continues to exist indefinitely, no matter what, even after the heat death of the universe, because there is always a non-zero probability that it will not cease to exist. In MWI, it is a physical necessity that each probability, no matter how low, is realised in a some universe. But in most universes, you will die within the expected timeframe.
There are dozens of interpretations of quantum mechanics, and MWI is just another one. It has many inconsistencies, so it would be unreasonable to accept such consequences from it.
I think Nietzsche's idea of eternal recurrence was intended as more of a sort of thought experiment, to see how far you can go in affirmimg existence; that's why it's only introduced in Thus Spoke Zarathistra and not elsewhere; it's not clear how much he actually believed in it. You might want to check out Advaita Vedanta, though, if that part of Nietzschian thought fascinates you!I believe in the Nietzschean concept of Eternal Recurrence. It's not exactly related to quantum immortality, but it's tangential.
I don't believe in it either, but how is it human-centric, exactly? It would apply to conscious non-humans as well.I don't believe in quantum immortality. It's human centric and doesn't make sense to me.
you're not understanding the theory entirelyDo you believe in quantum immortality? If it's true, CTB becomes far less scareful. Just a chance to overwrite all your mistakes.
this is either partially or all correctYou have probably misunderstood this concept.
It requires a system in a superposition, like a qubit, and a device which is entangled with that system and which will kill you instantly, so that you won't have any subseqquent conscious experience. Regular suicide methods do not offer this.
However, this will not save you from biological ageing and death, so this is not really immortality. You would only be "immortal" in the sense that you survive each iteration of quantum suicide.
Moreover, this experiment can only work if many-worlds interpretation (MWI) is correct, but practical implementation could still be impossible.
If MWI is correct, we can speculate that there is at least one branch in which your consciousness continues to exist indefinitely, no matter what, even after the heat death of the universe, because there is always a non-zero probability that it will not cease to exist. In MWI, it is a physical necessity that each probability, no matter how low, is realised in a some universe. But in most universes, you will die within the expected timeframe.
There are dozens of interpretations of quantum mechanics, and MWI is just another one. It has many inconsistencies, so it would be unreasonable to accept such consequences from it.
I think his thought experiment holds more merit than one would think, even outside of the story. It's one that existed long before he integrated it within his own works, and one that I believe makes sense even within a scientific context. It makes sense that many schools of thought have come to a similar train of thought.I think Nietzsche's idea of eternal recurrence was intended as more of a sort of thought experiment, to see how far you can go in affirmimg existence; that's why it's only introduced in Thus Spoke Zarathistra and not elsewhere; it's not clear how much he actually believed in it. You might want to check out Advaita Vedanta, though, if that part of Nietzschian thought fascinates you!