Least favorite/cons:
Pro-life
Ban on abortion
Belief that life begins at conception
Decisions and laws influenced by religion/religious beliefs (especially Christianity), "all life is 'sacred'"
I like the saying, its like fast food - you go to Taco Bell, one is a crunchy taco and one is a soft taco. Different wrapping but the same ingredients and filling. Like George Carlin said, "the illusion of choice," in a two party dictatorship lol
The way people ignore me when I share that both sides sound the same because they are using the same approach, or are actually the same, is silly to put it gently.
Politics is all about self interest. If you make a lot of money you probably don't want to pay a lot of taxes. If you're poor, you probably want the government to help you out, to help you get more money. Everybody's after their own self interest.
I'm assuming your use of liberal is in the contemporary American sense of the word, yes? As a classical liberal (moderate libertarian), I like to think I have a fairly keen sense for impartially finding faults & strengths among both sides of the aisle, so I'll take a crack at it.
Liberals:
Pros:
Tend to be much more creative and open-minded
Dominate the arts and modern academia
Generally place a greater value on science, empiricism, and technological developments
Bleeding hearts that seem to care about the socially disenfranchised and marginalized
Much more understanding of an individual's hardship & life circumstances
Cons:
Their worldview is largely compartmentalized into a false dichotomy of "oppressed vs oppressor"
Rabid fixation with identity politics (gender, race, religion, sexual orientation) where perceived oppression & victimhood is a valuable currency. Consequently, they feel morally justified in patronizing people that belong to "dominant social groups" (e.g. white people, men)
Likely to be more underhanded and surreptitious with their bigotry (e.g. benevolent racism, benevolent sexism)
Tend to be envious of those that are more successful or powerful than them
Generally more unprincipled, with their beliefs tethered by unaxiomatic systems despite their strong intuitive moral convictions
Pie in the sky idealism
Fervent supporters of political correctness
Far too trusting of big government to mend every societal ill
Tend to be more economically illiterate & believe many issues can be solved by just simply throwing more money at it
Their psychological disposition is generally more neurotic & temperamental
Very poor understanding of why people may disagree with their politics
Tend to be much more insulated from dissenting viewpoints
Seem to be chronically allergic to personal responsibility
Conservatives:
Pros:
Hardworking & conscientious
Pragmatic
Generally more well-versed in history, economics, finance, and business
Far greater sense of community & charity
In my personal experience, they're just generally more pleasant and friendlier to be around
Generally have a better understanding of liberals than the other way around
Cons:
Far too caught up in their old-timey conventional ways; fear of change
Claim to be the party of "small government", but will gladly wield the state as a cudgel when it's politically expedient for their personal interests
Tend to be more superficial, placing far too much importance on matters such as wealth and status
Can be a bit too harsh and unforgiving when it comes to crime & justice
Believe that order can only be maintained through rigid authority
Over-reliance on experience, as opposed to theories and abstractions
Overly-critical of democracy
An aversion towards globalization/internationalism in favor of blind nationalism
Will ardently defend social hierarchies and the status quo, insofar that it benefits them
Reactions:
Blurry_Buildings, pebpebpebpeb, sserafim and 1 other person
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.