motel rooms
Survivor of incest. Gay. Please don't PM me.
- Apr 13, 2021
- 7,081
Every group needs an enemy. In this case it's 'pro lifers ' or 'normies '
They outnumber us by far, so they are probably the ones who need us as an enemy/scapegoat...
Every group needs an enemy. In this case it's 'pro lifers ' or 'normies '
I once said to a friend that there are people with lives so boring that they feel the need to make enemies, just to have a super drama in their lives. ^^They outnumber us by far, so they are probably the ones who need us as an enemy/scapegoat...
I definitely can understand a pro choice point of view. I think it's true what somebody said, that I am not completely pro choice but also not truly pro life. What I am now understanding is that there is another viewpoint, just as strong as an extreme pro life view, but the opposite conclusion, called promortalist. It's interesting to me to learn about stuff life this.I believe in freedom and absolute body autonomy, and I completely disagree with you on some issues that you brought, like restricting drugs that can be used for this purpose, or that every life has inherent value.
But I highly appreciate that you are carrying this discussion in a civil way without falling for provocation and offended mentality. It's such a rarity to see this happen with dissenting points of view on this forum.
Your perspective is very interesting, definitely a nuanced point of view that clashes with the meta-mentality of this place, but valid nonetheless.
Really realistically and truthfully your philosophy means nothing to anyone else. It only pertains to you.I am for people having the choice, and I do think that everybody has the choice. I had the choice to buy my rope. When I think about something like N, something that easy, quick, and alluring, it occurs to me that it probably is best to not have it widely available on every street corner.
Not everything has to be completely restricted or completely permitted. Again, not black and white, it's gray. Surely, you can understand it. Honestly don't think it is too hard to understand.
Maybe I'm just doing a poor job explaining it, or else people are not used to a middle way.
Why does my philosophy mean nothing? Obviously, there are people here that think it means something, or else they would not even post about it in this thread. I would have been ignored if it meant nothing.Really realistically and truthfully your philosophy means nothing to anyone else. It only pertains to you.
You're an online presense here....no one knows you. Your beliefs are just your own. People can agree or disagree. People enjoy a philosophical debate. No one's beliefs mean anything except to one's own self. People desire to agree...so will question what you are saying and thinking...but this is just entertainment. Your philosophy means absolutely nothing to me or really anyone...it's just banter. Whatever someone chooses for whatever reason is their perogative.Why does my philosophy mean nothing? Obviously, there are people here that think it means something, or else they would not even post about it in this thread. I would have been ignored if it meant nothing.
Do you mean I am only thinking of myself with this philosophy? People have said that in this thread, but I also think about those left behind when somebody committed suicide. Their suffering has to be balanced with the suffering of the person "forced to live" by the inability to get an easy method. Our choices do not exist in a vacuum. I can't be completely for a pro choice point of view if it would increase suffering like this, by creating a grieving family, but I also can't be completely pro life becuase it would be forcing a person to suffer by continuing to live. Therefore, I have to take some sort of middle path.
I agree that it is not up to me and it shouldn't be up to me. For that reason I would be pro choice. I would also be pro life in the sense that I am more in support of people living than committing suicide. I don't think these two positions are in opposition. My overall position is that I would rather see somebody live and thrive than commit suicide, but I am in favor of them having a choice to end it if they are in unbearable torture.
For a start, because it allows us to experience things that non existence would not allow us to experience. Life would be awfully dull never experiencing anything, don't you think?
Why would you ever stay alive if death was so much better? And how would you ever know if it was better?
I would think that a person who was "pro-death" as I called it, would not even be alive to type to me. Why would you ever stay alive if death was so much better? And how would you ever know if it was better?
These thoughts seem to be destined to create a division between people, a separation. Everybody is an island unto himself, and your thoughts are only your own. Nobody cares.You're an online character here....no one knows you. Your beliefs are just your own. People can agree or disagree. People enjoy a philosophical debate. No one's beliefs mean anything except to one's own self. People desire to agree...so will question what you are saying and thinking...but this is just entertainment. Your philosophy means absolutely nothing to me or really anyone...it's just banter. Whatever someone chooses for whatever reason is their perogative.
No one cares at the end of the day. It's only what you think that matters to you. I'm not trying to be rude...I am just saying that anyone's philosophy is just their own. Others can agree or disagree but these are just thoughts...and thoughts don't really matter much.
I think it's cruel to mock people that are already suffering. Ultimately, I think it is a lack of understanding on their part that causes pro life people to butt into the affairs of suicidal people. If your life has been great, then you can only imagine a suicidal person must be stupid or deluded. I think everybody suffers from this lack of understanding though, myself included.pro life people mock suicidal people rejoice in a person feeling pain whilst attempting to CTB, they set up fake profiles and try to scare other members and increase peoples anxiety or post misinformation. they openly invite nonces to be part of their group (one used to be a member here) they do all this while pretending they want o help members( do they really no t understand how fucking stupid that sounds lol). they really do think they are cleverer than members here and that everyone on this site is stupid.
who the fuck are they to get involved in a random strangers business, they can't even look after their own kids so i sure as hell wouldn't trust them to help other people. they should of made more effort to save their own relatives rather than mother a load of strangers who don't want their 'help'.
people join this site out of choice and no1 is forced to. people can search whatever they want and decide to do whatever they want to. people make out like as if people have a gun held to their heads to search and buy stuff. they will say oh they aren't thinking right/ well i'm pretty sure you have to have some sort of brain to search and find the information( especially given how much BS post and fake information are posted) they then have to pay using bitcoin(if that a choice they make and it would take effort to learn to). a person that can do all that knows exactly what they are doing
The argument "suicide must be regulated because it hurts those left behind" is an awfully weak one.People have said that in this thread, but I also think about those left behind when somebody committed suicide. Their suffering has to be balanced with the suffering of the person "forced to live" by the inability to get an easy method. Our choices do not exist in a vacuum. I can't be completely for a pro choice point of view if it would increase suffering like this, by creating a grieving family, but I also can't be completely pro life becuase it would be forcing a person to suffer by continuing to live.
Some things can't change, like mental disabilities. I despise the prolifers that think any situation can improve with time.
The effect of a death, especially a suicide is much greater than simply cutting off contact.Nothing hinders me from abruptly cutting off all contact with my family, moving to another country and leaving no address. I could simply disappear and vanish from their lives completely, which would be akin to dying. There is no law prohibiting this, and no one in their right mind would advocate such a law.
Not really a good analogy because alcohol is regulated. We don't allow kids to drink because it would cause harm. There are restrictions on it, although it is not banned. Actually, this example seems more to support my own point.Nothing hinders me from entering the next liquor store and drinking myself into a stupor until I see pink elephants. Alcohol addiction has caused great harm and heartbreak to many families, yet it is entirely legal to drink as much as you please (as long as you pay for it).
Actually, if you take a complete pro choice point of view I don't see what is stopping you from saying that nothing at all should be regulated. Let's have complete free choice. No laws, no restrictions on guns, drugs, or crime.There are innumerable ways to legally cause emotional harm to people close to you; should all of them be forbidden?
The argument "suicide must be regulated because it hurts those left behind" is an awfully weak one.
Nothing hinders me from abruptly cutting off all contact with my family, moving to another country and leaving no address. I could simply disappear and vanish from their lives completely, which would be akin to dying. There is no law prohibiting this, and no one in their right mind would advocate such a law.
Nothing hinders me from entering the next liquor store and drinking myself into a stupor until I see pink elephants. Alcohol addiction has caused great harm and heartbreak to many families, yet it is entirely legal to drink as much as you please (as long as you pay for it).
There are innumerable ways to legally cause emotional harm to people close to you; should all of them be forbidden?
Of course they should not. This begs the question: Why should suicide be singled out?
Certainly not due to its irreversible nature. Alcohol abuse often leads to irreversible damage; if one is hell-bent on cutting all ties with one's family, this can easily be a permanent decision as well.
Yes, I do assume that life has value, but not from a religious perspective. Why would I say that it has value? For a start, because it allows us to experience things that non existence would not allow us to experience. Life would be awfully dull never experiencing anything, don't you think?
Yes, life allows beings like me to experience magical things like being raped & beaten by my own father for ten years. Forgive me for not thinking that my life has value. I don't have a problem with anyone believing that their life has immense value, but please don't claim that life in general / every life has inherent value
Why would I say that life has value? For a start, because it allows us to experience things that non existence would not allow us to experience.
That is indeed true. But I don't think that life can derive value from that because 1) the nonexistent don't have the ability to mourn their lack of phenomenological experience, since that would require them to exist in the first place. If all life died out tomorrow, no one could find any fault in that, since everyone would be dead.
2) You don't outright say it, but when you say "experience" you probably think of all the nice and good things, like sunsets and pizza. But this argument can be turned around to say that life enables us to experience all the nasty and bad things, like anxiety, sadness, physical pain, rape, abuse, trauma, etc. And even if you didn't mean pleasurable experiences, then I wonder how experience itself, regardless of the contents of consciousness, can be said to have value, outside of subjective preference.
@Sisyphus I'd like to read your response to what I & @BottomlessPit said about life not having inherent value
--------------------------
That was a little bit of a joke response on my part to be honest. I haven't really carved out a philosophy when it come to life having or not having value. I think most people would assume it does in fact have value. You guys were correct though in that I do assume that. You guys have a philosophy when it comes to this matter, and you obviously have spent some time thinking it through. I haven't really thought much about it before this thread, and I don't say you are wrong. You can decide if that view seems true to you, or it is helpful for your life, or your death.@Sisyphus I'd like to read your response to what I & @BottomlessPit said about life not having inherent value
--------------------------
How so? If I leave without telling anyone and never contact them anymore, how is that any different from departing this life?The effect of a death, especially a suicide is much greater than simply cutting off contact.
The only regulations alcohol is subjected to are quality standards and the age limit you mentioned. Apart from that you can consume as much as you like and damage yourself (and by extension your family and friends) to your hearts content in the process. It does not support your point at all, unless you are a proponent of making professionally administered euthanasia available for anyone over the age of 18.Not really a good analogy because alcohol is regulated. We don't allow kids to drink because it would cause harm. There are restrictions on it, although it is not banned. Actually, this example seems more to support my own point.
This has nothing to do with the argument at hand.Actually, if you take a complete pro choice point of view I don't see what is stopping you from saying that nothing at all should be regulated. Let's have complete free choice. No laws, no restrictions on guns, drugs, or crime.
How so? If I leave without telling anyone and never contact them anymore, how is that any different from departing this life?
That was a little bit of a joke response on my part to be honest. I haven't really carved out a philosophy when it come to life having or not having value. I think most people would assume it does in fact have value. You guys were correct though in that I do assume that. You guys have a philosophy when it comes to this matter, and you obviously have spent some time thinking it through. I haven't really thought much about it before this thread, and I don't say you are wrong. You can decide if that view seems true to you, or it is helpful for your life, or your death.
It's interesting to me, but I am not against it, per se. Whatever works for you. I just don't think it would work for me because I am still trying to live.
I do think we should have less limits on this than we do currently, but I don't think it should be completely unrestricted. A fully pro choice viewpoint would lead to situations like children getting euthanasia because their toys were taken away. So you support it then only for people that are over 18?It does not support your point at all, unless you are a proponent of making professionally administered euthanasia available for anyone over the age of 18.
On the other hand, if we leave the choice to the desperate or suffering person and we try to help him, without putting pressure or stress on him, there is a good chance of convincing him to change his mind in such a way. temporary or permanent.
Whatever works for you. I just don't think it would work for me because I am still trying to live.
Now, I do support the right of people to committ suicide if they are truly hopeless, but that is probably a small fraction of those who ultimately end up dying by their own hand.
Yes, I do beleive that most of those people could be helped, in other words that they are not truly hopeless, if we could get them the help that they deserve. It's stigma against mental illness, in part, that prevents our society from developing effective treatments and getting them to the people that need them.Do you honestly believe that only a small fraction of those who ultimately ctb are "truly hopeless"?
So....how can people unemployable with no hope for income be helped? How can someone stuck in an abusive/toxic relationship with no earned income be helped? You're really putting on a pedestal the notion of 'help'. Suicidal people are not all suffering from mental problems. They are evicted, criminalized (felonies that don't disappear and cause unemployablity) people with failed careers, people working jobs with no retirement benefits....Yes, I do beleive that most of those people could be helped, in other words that they are not truly hopeless, if we could get them the help that they deserve. It's stigma against mental illness, in part, that prevents our society from developing effective treatments and getting them to the people that need them.
Interesting stuff that you linked there. I read the article and watched the video. I think that the article does bring into question how impulsivity relates to suicidal behavior.
The video helped me realize that I lack a central component that many people need to CTB, namely the ability to hurt myself. I'm always worrying about my health, so I dont do anything risky.
I am unemployable with no hope of income due to my health problems. This is the major reason I am considering CTB, to not die starving on the street. I wake up in panic every day about this situation but I also suffer from severe depression. My best case for my life is a life of poverty on disability, if I can even get that, but I have already been denied in the past so don't think so.So....how can people unemployable with no hope for income be helped? How can someone stuck in an abusive/toxic relationship with no earned income be helped? You're really putting on a pedestal the notion of 'help'. Suicidal people are not all suffering from mental problems. They are evicted, criminalized (felonies that don't disappear and cause unemployablity) people with failed careers, people working jobs with no retirement benefits....
Many people get diagnosed mentally ill when in fact their lives suck due to poverty and no upward mobility. Many people taking meds have truly shitty stuck lives...financial stress is a HUGE factor for many suicidal people.
Again it doesn't really matter what people think, but it sounds like you have bought into the common misconception and judgment that it takes someone mental to want to/or actually kill themselves. This is not true. If general needs are not met (food, shelter, companionship) people feel bad and want it to end.
People kills themselves for a plethora of reasons. Very poor, very rich...sick...well and unhappy...
List of suicides in the 21st century - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org