Akasha
Member
- Jan 7, 2021
- 20
It's so much easier to say a method is bad, than actually assisting the person in dying more peacefully. Blame society for what happens to the train driver, not the victim that has no choice in a better method.
I've decided not to vote. There are various factors contributing to the outcome of this method. I can't imagine someone surviving a headbutt like this. Maybe the neck would be broken if it's positioned in a certain way. I'm thinking of about... 105 degrees from the ground, and arching the neck so that I'm looking directly at the level of my thighs... I don't know really.I would love to know the reasoning behind the people that voted "no". I can wrap my head around people that may be unsure but no and then no explanation in the comments?
He had enough business sense to teach economics, that's for certain.I don't have a definitive answer for you but this reminds me of when my old Economics teacher in school used to tell us about how he was a tube driver in London for several years and there would often be suicides while he'd be driving but he'd offer to do the 'cleaning up' for extra pay and holidays he was an odd dude but I liked him lol
Circumstance. If I had access to any other reliable methods like shooting in the head I would just go for that.My guy, fucking up someone else's mental health for life shouldn't be your legacy. There's so many methods, why are you so married to the train thing? You mentioned in a previous comment you feel the train is more honourable. There is no honour in hurting others.
Unfortunately my circumstances don't leave me with many options.Assuming the train hits like concrete floor, using Torricelli's equation and considering 100 km/h (~28 m/s), it would be equivalent to jumping head first from 40 meters high, which takes slight less than 3 seconds. Should work. However, I'd rather be less of a nuisance and jump, but you do you.