
nosurpries
Member
- Jul 3, 2022
- 97
⚠️ UK Access Block Notice: Beginning July 1, 2025, this site will no longer be accessible from the United Kingdom. This is a voluntary decision made by the site's administrators. We were not forced or ordered to implement this block. If you're located in the UK, we recommend using a VPN to maintain access.
couldn't agree moreThat is really terrible. If someone wants to leave then they have the right to do so. Only the individual can decide whether their life is worth living or not and nobody else should have any say in it. I actually find it hard to believe that the website is being serious, that is just pro life nonsense. Not everyone can find a way to resolve their problems and even if there was, they do not have to either. Life is completely meaningless and all humans will die eventually someday so to me there is nothing wrong with someone deciding to leave at a time of their own choosing.
Yeah it has a tiny point, but those are exactly the same people who built the anti-suicide narrative, the ones who make euthanasia such a crime.I understand that they're just trying to discourage people from ending their lives. If we are going to argue that we alone have a right to decide whether or not to stay on this earth, we have to, also, acknowledge that others have a right to try and dissuade people from killing themselves. And I do agree with one thing they say and that is it is very likely that someone jumping from the top of that bridge will not be instantaneously killed when hitting the water. There probably will be a great deal of pain and suffering before succumbing to one's injuries. That's just plain physics. They just don't want people jumping from that bridge. That's all they're saying. They almost have to say all that just for public relations, so it seems like they are doing everything they can to keep people from jumping, along with the barriers they, apparently, just put up, too. I don't even think it has anything to do with them being pro-lifers. I think it has more to do with the politics of it.
I really can't argue your point, and I do get it, but I think suicide has been considered taboo long before those people, specifically the one who owns the website and his supporters, came into being. And I understand what your saying, meaning those "type" of people. They're around and always will be, I suspect. Things would be better (for us) if assisted suicide was accepted. But, we live in the world we live in and, right now, it's not. Not really sure if allowing a bunch of suicidal people to jump off a bridge and wash up on shore, possibly being found by families with children out on boats, or fishing off the shore, would change that idea, though. Seems it may entrench those "types" of people even more in their beliefs, maybe even bring more over to their side.Yeah it has a tiny point, but those are exactly the same people who built the anti-suicide narrative, the ones who make euthanasia such a crime.
The jumpers are not suicide bomber, they are just people like us but with less fortunate access to good death; also we deserve the low-fenced old bridge if only we give equal rights to assisted suicide as the way out.