A
Aap
Enlightened
- Apr 26, 2020
- 1,856
Both can be true. Like any bureaucracy, it can be ineffective but have some go getters. UK has clamped down on SN quite a bit, and it would not be the first person sectioned because of it.
Since it is a small town, there may not be many people in OPs age range with the same name who have been sectioned previously, especially if they were elevated to some watch list. Of course, it could have been someone close to OP who was shadowing them here due to a browser or phone left carelessly open.
Since it is a small town, there may not be many people in OPs age range with the same name who have been sectioned previously, especially if they were elevated to some watch list. Of course, it could have been someone close to OP who was shadowing them here due to a browser or phone left carelessly open.