Darkover
Angelic
- Jul 29, 2021
- 4,738
I don't believe prospective parents often consider the full range of implications involved in creating another person and often do it for purely selfish reasons.
Since it is absurd to suggest that a person can exist before it is conceived, it is also absurd to suggest that by not conceiving this hypothetical person you are in some way depriving 'it' of life, and of all the potential happiness that life may entail.
Since happiness is not guaranteed, and that a certain amount of suffering necessarily is - bringing into life a new person is imposing suffering onto another being and is therefore immoral.
There is no good reason to give a non-existent hypothetical person 'a chance at happiness' because 'they' cannot be deprived of such a thing and to do so is therefore entirely unjustified based on our reasons of 'wanting to spread the chance at happiness'.
In the unjustified attempt at providing non-existent people a chance at happiness, we necessarily impose upon them the very real risk of serious harm - be it emotional or physical. Imposing unnecessary, unjustified harm on a person is in my opinion, an immoral act.
Justifying having children on other grounds, such as continuing the human species, uses the person as a means to an unjustified end, as a sacrifice to some optimistic view of a possible future - an equally immoral act in my eyes.
Since it is absurd to suggest that a person can exist before it is conceived, it is also absurd to suggest that by not conceiving this hypothetical person you are in some way depriving 'it' of life, and of all the potential happiness that life may entail.
Since happiness is not guaranteed, and that a certain amount of suffering necessarily is - bringing into life a new person is imposing suffering onto another being and is therefore immoral.
There is no good reason to give a non-existent hypothetical person 'a chance at happiness' because 'they' cannot be deprived of such a thing and to do so is therefore entirely unjustified based on our reasons of 'wanting to spread the chance at happiness'.
In the unjustified attempt at providing non-existent people a chance at happiness, we necessarily impose upon them the very real risk of serious harm - be it emotional or physical. Imposing unnecessary, unjustified harm on a person is in my opinion, an immoral act.
Justifying having children on other grounds, such as continuing the human species, uses the person as a means to an unjustified end, as a sacrifice to some optimistic view of a possible future - an equally immoral act in my eyes.