No, I'm just stating facts of philosophy. Men are depressed over a lack of sex. For some women, sex is not that big a deal. Therefore a commitment to collective happiness (utilitarianism) requires such women to create happiness by having sex with men who are sad because of a lack of it.
Example: If there is a starving dog, the noble thing is to feed it. It would be callous to be giving food treats to the fat cat (alpha) in sight of the starving dog (beta virgin) when the sum happiness of all can be increased by feeding the starving dog either instead or as well.
This doesn't apply to those women for whom sex is a big deal, as the increase in happiness given would be countered by the anxiety to the self, etc. But for women for whom sex means very little, utilitarianism necessitates that they sleep with men (i.e. virgins) for whom it means a lot. That creates far, far more happiness in the world than, say, donating a few quid to the third world - and other trivial things women do.
A woman has the capacity to create so much happiness - life changing happiness - at very very little cost to herself. Women have sex with any 6 2 dude like it means nothing, and yet making someone's year is some how too big of an ask.