Well, the points the OP mentions are observations across the manosphere, not just the redpill community
Do you have Fresh & Fit in mind, who do humiliate women over 30? It's important to know they
humiliate men arguably much harder — if we don't succeed, we're "losers", "brokies", "simps", etc. And that's most of us, like 80-90%. Watch their call-in shows, see them break men down & make them face reality: women tend to wait at the finish line & fuck the winners. This, they maintain, is the awful truth that we simply have to adjust to. Most men have lower value than women of the same age, until 30
I
explore their role in patriarchy here
Many in the redpill community would consider the OP a whiner who accomplishes nothing but repulse women. And judging my the responses here, seems they're right
What's an alternative? One's to organize the losers of patriarchy against it
I wouldn't say they're oblivious. They just don't give a fuck
Why?
- they benefit from surplus lonely men, like bosses benefit from surplus unemployed
- certain ideologies reduce their natural human sympathy
- they're biologically/culturally repulsed by weaker men
To illustrate matters, what have you done against the homelessness crisis? Or the crisis of lonely older women? Or hell, even the suicide crisis?
OP, you can ignore this post. SaSu was founded by incels. Which is why it supports free speech more than other forums. This poster can assert what "we accept" all they want, but we can equally disagree
Furthermore, this one runs around with the avatar of a guy (Ludwig Wittgenstein) who got fired from teaching because
he beat up kids:
Ditto women here, whose suffering nevertheless doesn't cause them to sympathize with your plight. As bell hooks
honestly said:
"Most women do not want to deal with male pain if it interferes with the satisfaction of female desire"
She talked about how she didn't even wanna hear about her boyfriend's pain — after pushing him to open up:
"I did not want my image of the strong man truly challenged by learning of his weaknesses and vulnerabilities. Here I was, an enlightened feminist woman who did not want to hear my man speak his pain because it revealed his emotional vulnerability. It stands to reason, then, that the masses of women committed to the sexist principle that men who express their feelings are weak really do not want to hear men speak, especially if what they say is that they hurt, that they feel unloved."
Whereas they're gentle with a
loud TERF saying we men have Death Privilege, because homeless men die unvalued — whereas gals' bodies have inherent value
Even gals who can't learn algebra. Wittgenstein was only supposed to beat non-genius boys. Just like many mothers — we see how women act when they're finally in a position of physical dominance. I've comforted women who confessed they wanted to
dash their babies' brains against a wall
Anyway. You're not alone. If you want the skills to have girlfriends, these are the best guys I know in the manosphere, who don't sugarcoat women's nature:
Alexander Grace,
Orion Taraban,
Casey Zander,
Fresh&Fit
The red pill is perilous to swallow. Women are not what the media portrays them as. Orion Taraban said guys who swallow it make a growling sputter, as if they're choking. And if you don't swallow it completely, the choking never ends. (Until you die)
You might naturally want a peer, a teammate. But that is so unlikely.
High quality women are often snapped up quickly. Might help you to have low expectations, like Wittgenstein:
"
the fact that I'm a British-born Indian makes things even worse though in terms on being looked down on by women. So you could imagine how amplified this current situation for 18-29 y/o males seems in my POV
