
wljourney
Waiting for the bus
- Apr 2, 2022
- 1,419
Thank you for this. Very interesting points to consider.Honestly I think using actual oxy might be easier to quantify reliably. Bare in mind that fentanyl is just another opioid. It's strong by volume sure but that's all. It's no more likely to successful than oxy, clean heroin or most other opioids in its class. I think F seems appealing partly due to it's notoriety in the press but when you really consider it, it makes little sense to chase it down to use pills with varying unreliable quantity if you can access a more reliably dosed alternative. There are many analogues/opioids stronger by volume than F now too so it's likely some of those are finding there way into pills. Fact of the matter is we just don't know what's in them (even when they test positive for F there could be other active components in there) and as a result we can't say with any degree of certainty how peaceful the experience will be from one batch too another. I mean I would wager it would be peaceful but its just not a certainty.
Pressed Oxy doesn't usually contain oxycodone. If it did there'd be little point in adding fent. Instead it contains the fent as a substitute due to its availability (for criminal particular organisations) and low cost. Therefore the pressed pills are a fraction of the cost of genuine ones. Similarly street heroin (and probably dark net source heroin) is actually cheaper by weight and strength but again, like the pills it's strength is not reliably quantified.
Don't get me wrong, I don't blame OP for going down the pressed/counterfeit M30 route. If I had easy access I would too. I'm not even opposed to H as alternative for me personally. I'm just saying that if a measured approach is desired there is absolutely no reason not to go with genuine oxy or similar. Ironically they're easier to source in sone places though not all of course. I think it's worth noting that your position on the map is a relevant factor in what's obtainable and that in turn might well inform your opioid of choice. Also noteworthy is the reason this method isn't considered as highly as you might expect in the ppeh rating system and that is of course the risk of being bought round if found and the potential implications that could have on your ongoing quality of life and those around you. These risks are present with other methods too and I think it's really important that they're stressed in any kind of compilation of info.
Another factor might be cost but if you're able to afford N (if it were available) then you could afford opioids. Both are illegal but sources for opioids are much more plentiful although that does come with less documented reliability for each one respectively. So I guess any compiled plan would require the consideration of a few opioids/opiates. The result and regemen would be essentially the same. The only variables would be dose and potentially ROA I think. Aside from those of an individual nature for the user
I wil add that there are some opioids I'd steer clear of based on my experience. They would include the likes of codeine phosphate and dihydrocodeine. In my personal experience they're not very nice in high doses (recreationally) and came with dry heaving and discomfort. Also some opioids are sold with another active analgesic ingredient mixed in and I'd rule those out too.
My hope was that F or Oxy could be a practicable alternative to N.
Especially after seeing so many people being scammed trying to obtain N these past few weeks.
However, considering your post, and the need to locally source this, I now have my doubts.
Wouldn't a sudden pivot to M30s or even real Oxy (for example) mean that even more people make themselves vulnerable to being scammed?
It would be a nightmare and impossible to identify scammers if there are dozens of contacts flying around - say a few for each country - opposed to just one (like D) or 3-4 (like SN).