Kawaii_Shoujo215
Eternal Torment of Thy Flesh-Prison
- Jul 27, 2022
- 30
Life is slavery. We are always tormented by others dictating our lives, by the oppressive system of capitalism, and even fundamentally, we are slaves to our own desires, slaves to nature. We are all biological puppets, dancing and smiling as the theater burns to the ground, along with us. Endless torment of our flesh prison, a painted puppet of joints ready to collapse, a diseased and suffering thing, with a head full of false imaginings, and yet other pathetic sentient bags of meat continue to force us to live here, in this hell of endless torment, desire, and striving. To live, is to chase the carrot on the stick forever, only to be disappointed by its lackluster taste. Our bodies, our prisons of flesh, will always be plagued with dissatisfaction, discomfort and desire. And if by some miracle you can satisfy all of these absurd, ridiculous needs, the satisfaction fades before you can even process it occured. Boredom ensues. Life is a swinging pendulum between dissatisfaction and boredom, all underneath the tyranny of suffering. And yet we are led to believe that life is sacred, it is worth it! The indoctrination and copium of the masses is truly horrifying, a telltale sign that nature's cruelty knows no bounds. Programmed to survive and reproduce at all costs, it is all a game, a rat race, to see who can suffer the most. Forcing an innocent non-being into existence, into a realm of only suffering, dissatisfaction and hate, and denying their pleas to leave, can only be the work of the devil. We truly are in hell. Death is the annihilation of all of this, it is freedom from the clutches of hell. It takes away all suffering, torment and desire. And while it rids us of the few "good" things, it takes away too the desire for them.
Along this line of thought, suicide becomes the only true rational and sane action. To finally escape the endless cycle of suffering, is to be free. And yet, natures cruelty f*cks us all over, as always. Survival instinct is the poster child: programmed to live above all else, a primitive and evil desire made to prevent the only escape, the only hope any sentient being has. And the primitive instinct to prevent suicide, to prevent the alleviation of suffering, extends to others too. "You mustn't kill yourself, it is wrong!", is what they say. Misery loves company. We truly are slaves, from the moment we're born, until the void frees us of our suffering at death.
Until my day of reckoning, I'll have to stay in this world of endless pain, and continue my suffering for the sick pleasure of others who claim to love me, and yet proceed to prolong my agonizing existence whilst ignoring my pleas to escape, all to satisfy their selfish, narrow-minded belief that they 'saved' somebody, when in reality all they saved was the agony of the individual. And they always try to justify it, to rationalize it. They say suicide is selfish, and yet nothing is more selfish than forcing someone to suffer so that you can feel better about yourself. In my eyes, this is nothing more than a justification for suffering, and suffering is NEVER justified. We are old enough to die the moment we're born. For now, I am trapped in this hell, and until euthanasia becomes legal for the non-terminally ill, it seems I will remain a slave in this hell. Here's to hoping I may one day overcome my biological programming and catch the bus peacefully, and painlessly.
While killing oneself early not only prevents future suffering aswell as assures one's own death is peaceful, painless and humane (which natural death cannot say - shit's brutal, man), I would be just as bad as the pro-lifers if I forced everyone to do something they do not wish to do. When and how I die should be my decision, as without the right to die, there can be no right to live, only an obligation. While I believe forcing someone to live (and by extension to suffer) is evil, the same could be said for forcing someone to die. At the end of the day, if we truly own our own bodies and our own lives, we should have the right to end this pitiful existence, and yet those who wish to live, shall be allowed to aswell. Only then can life (at least in societal terms) not be slavery. If I cannot choose to end my life, if I am forced to live in a world and in a body of suffering and endless problems, then I am a slave. I am a firm believer of anti-suffering. If suffering can be avoided, it should. And I'm tired of people burying their heads into the sand and pretending life is some holy gift that must be protected and is always worth the trouble. Spoiler alert: it isn't. I'm not saying all must die, despite believing it to be the path of least suffering: I'm just saying that the decision to end one's own life should always be respected, and that blindly believing what we are conditioned to by our parents and society only leads to the obstruction of progress that is the choice to end one's own suffering, if one so wishes to without forcing anyone else to.
This also leads me to the age argument. As a child is powerless against their own birth (as everyone is), they too should get to make the decision between continuing to live and to end their life. Forcing someone to live for your own benefit is slavery. And why should only slavery for those fully matured be condemned? Since when have we allowed children to be manipulated and forced to live a life they may not want, and that they certainly didn't ask for? And we (as in society) invalidate their suffering on the basis that they're "too young". Well, guess what? Nature doesn't give a damn about your social constructs. Suffering doesn't discriminate, it torments all from birth all the way to our final breaths. Why must we force children to suffer for 2 decades before they can finally leave a place they never wished to be in?
Another point is that parents often say they love their children, and as such don't want them to die. However, does that really mean they care for the child as an individual, or only as an idea? If they truly cared for the child as an individual, wouldn't they want what was in the child's best interest? And who knows what is in their best interest better than the child itself? Wouldn't they want their child to experience the least amount of suffering possible? Instead, they choose to prolong the child's suffering to make themsves happy; to prevent the pain of the loss of a loved one. Parents do not care for the well being of their child, for they only care for their own feelings: the child's external "happiness" makes them feel happy, the child wanting to end its suffering causes them pain. Rather than act in the best interest of the child, they act in a way that benefits them, even if they don't realize and think they are doing the right thing. They are selfish and despicable manipulators who have deluded themselves into thinking they know someone better than the person themselves. Loving them despite this is Stockholm Syndrome, which is also the result of our biological programming: the child loves it's manipulators; they, in turn, "protect" the child from the freedom of death: their only job is to birth suffering and prolong it at all costs.
The parents, of course, are oblivious to this. It is their subconscious programming, after all, they truly believe they are doing what is in the best interest of the child. This delusion, this disempowerment of the individual, is the biggest barrier between a child and the escape of this realm of suffering. The parents do not care for the wellbeing of the child: they care only for the IDEA of the child, that exists to make them feel good about themselves, to prevent their own suffering. Preventing one's own suffering is not a bad thing, but if it leads to forcing someone else to exist, to continue their suffering, then it is manipulative and despicable.
I've stated my pro-mortalist views before. According to my belief, the best course of action is for all sentient life to die NOW, and forever. This would rid the universe of suffering forever (or atleast until life arises again, should such a tradgedy occur). But as I said also, it has to be the individual's decision. It isn't a choice if only one option can be chosen.
I don't understand why people blindly believe that life is inherently better than death: even a perfect life would be undesirable when faced with the choice between life and death. At the very least, even if you don't agree, a decent human being would at least respect the decisions of a fellow sufferer, and allow them to leave. If you like being in this burning building, then stay! But don't force others to choke on the flames when the exit is right there, it costs nothing to step aside and allow their suffering to cease.
Along this line of thought, suicide becomes the only true rational and sane action. To finally escape the endless cycle of suffering, is to be free. And yet, natures cruelty f*cks us all over, as always. Survival instinct is the poster child: programmed to live above all else, a primitive and evil desire made to prevent the only escape, the only hope any sentient being has. And the primitive instinct to prevent suicide, to prevent the alleviation of suffering, extends to others too. "You mustn't kill yourself, it is wrong!", is what they say. Misery loves company. We truly are slaves, from the moment we're born, until the void frees us of our suffering at death.
Until my day of reckoning, I'll have to stay in this world of endless pain, and continue my suffering for the sick pleasure of others who claim to love me, and yet proceed to prolong my agonizing existence whilst ignoring my pleas to escape, all to satisfy their selfish, narrow-minded belief that they 'saved' somebody, when in reality all they saved was the agony of the individual. And they always try to justify it, to rationalize it. They say suicide is selfish, and yet nothing is more selfish than forcing someone to suffer so that you can feel better about yourself. In my eyes, this is nothing more than a justification for suffering, and suffering is NEVER justified. We are old enough to die the moment we're born. For now, I am trapped in this hell, and until euthanasia becomes legal for the non-terminally ill, it seems I will remain a slave in this hell. Here's to hoping I may one day overcome my biological programming and catch the bus peacefully, and painlessly.
While killing oneself early not only prevents future suffering aswell as assures one's own death is peaceful, painless and humane (which natural death cannot say - shit's brutal, man), I would be just as bad as the pro-lifers if I forced everyone to do something they do not wish to do. When and how I die should be my decision, as without the right to die, there can be no right to live, only an obligation. While I believe forcing someone to live (and by extension to suffer) is evil, the same could be said for forcing someone to die. At the end of the day, if we truly own our own bodies and our own lives, we should have the right to end this pitiful existence, and yet those who wish to live, shall be allowed to aswell. Only then can life (at least in societal terms) not be slavery. If I cannot choose to end my life, if I am forced to live in a world and in a body of suffering and endless problems, then I am a slave. I am a firm believer of anti-suffering. If suffering can be avoided, it should. And I'm tired of people burying their heads into the sand and pretending life is some holy gift that must be protected and is always worth the trouble. Spoiler alert: it isn't. I'm not saying all must die, despite believing it to be the path of least suffering: I'm just saying that the decision to end one's own life should always be respected, and that blindly believing what we are conditioned to by our parents and society only leads to the obstruction of progress that is the choice to end one's own suffering, if one so wishes to without forcing anyone else to.
This also leads me to the age argument. As a child is powerless against their own birth (as everyone is), they too should get to make the decision between continuing to live and to end their life. Forcing someone to live for your own benefit is slavery. And why should only slavery for those fully matured be condemned? Since when have we allowed children to be manipulated and forced to live a life they may not want, and that they certainly didn't ask for? And we (as in society) invalidate their suffering on the basis that they're "too young". Well, guess what? Nature doesn't give a damn about your social constructs. Suffering doesn't discriminate, it torments all from birth all the way to our final breaths. Why must we force children to suffer for 2 decades before they can finally leave a place they never wished to be in?
Another point is that parents often say they love their children, and as such don't want them to die. However, does that really mean they care for the child as an individual, or only as an idea? If they truly cared for the child as an individual, wouldn't they want what was in the child's best interest? And who knows what is in their best interest better than the child itself? Wouldn't they want their child to experience the least amount of suffering possible? Instead, they choose to prolong the child's suffering to make themsves happy; to prevent the pain of the loss of a loved one. Parents do not care for the well being of their child, for they only care for their own feelings: the child's external "happiness" makes them feel happy, the child wanting to end its suffering causes them pain. Rather than act in the best interest of the child, they act in a way that benefits them, even if they don't realize and think they are doing the right thing. They are selfish and despicable manipulators who have deluded themselves into thinking they know someone better than the person themselves. Loving them despite this is Stockholm Syndrome, which is also the result of our biological programming: the child loves it's manipulators; they, in turn, "protect" the child from the freedom of death: their only job is to birth suffering and prolong it at all costs.
The parents, of course, are oblivious to this. It is their subconscious programming, after all, they truly believe they are doing what is in the best interest of the child. This delusion, this disempowerment of the individual, is the biggest barrier between a child and the escape of this realm of suffering. The parents do not care for the wellbeing of the child: they care only for the IDEA of the child, that exists to make them feel good about themselves, to prevent their own suffering. Preventing one's own suffering is not a bad thing, but if it leads to forcing someone else to exist, to continue their suffering, then it is manipulative and despicable.
I've stated my pro-mortalist views before. According to my belief, the best course of action is for all sentient life to die NOW, and forever. This would rid the universe of suffering forever (or atleast until life arises again, should such a tradgedy occur). But as I said also, it has to be the individual's decision. It isn't a choice if only one option can be chosen.
I don't understand why people blindly believe that life is inherently better than death: even a perfect life would be undesirable when faced with the choice between life and death. At the very least, even if you don't agree, a decent human being would at least respect the decisions of a fellow sufferer, and allow them to leave. If you like being in this burning building, then stay! But don't force others to choke on the flames when the exit is right there, it costs nothing to step aside and allow their suffering to cease.
