TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,874
This is perhaps a very common, inane statement that pro-lifers like to spew, especially by delusional optimists. It is very cringey and cheesy to hear that coming from the pro-lifers and it is very obnoxious for people who don't share the same sentiments. More often than not, they will invoke this (or similar) line whenever they hear, see, or have knowledge of someone being "negative" or having a perspective that is incompatible with them. More often than not, whenever someone is going through terrible things or speak of the ills of life (life sucks, or whatever one is complaining with regards to life), they are quickly shut down, dismissed, and then fed such banal lines and platitudes.
If anything, these pro-lifers are delusional and not living in reality while the pessimists are being realistic albeit gloomy and depressing. The truth is there are lots of suffering in the world and just because one form of suffering is less (or even different from another) does not discount that suffering is a negative and bad experience that must be resolved and/or avoided if possible.
Eye Doubt It's video here shows and debunks the reality of existence/life:
With that said, we pro-choicers may be pessimistic, but at least we are honest and in line with reality and not providing false hope nor living in a delusion, pretending things are all fine. While it is possible that pro-lifers may have experienced losses and negative things (as well as suffering), the fact that they mask it and try to suppress anything that may remind of what reality has in store for them is just wrong. In the video that I linked in this thread, life is full of suffering.
Another kind of pro-lifer (usually religious ones) is the one that tries to rationalize and justify the suffering that part of the beauty of life is also suffering. That is just as bad or perhaps even worse because they are attributing suffering to be a positive thing, which clearly is not. Just because everyone has to deal with suffering just by default does not mean that everyone should be expected to do so in the same way, let alone on the same terms. Everyone has their limits and view on how much suffering they are going to take. There are many more bad things and just because pro-lifers don't experience the worst of things does not imply that life is beautiful. Instead, life is full of (unnecessary) suffering and the cessation of existence or to never have been is not a bad thing, perhaps even a positive thing because the lack of suffering and nothingness can never be a bad thing. This is because even if nothingness itself is the absence of good things (since one would have be conscious and sentient to experience the good and the bad), the absence of bad things from the state of nothingness is a neutral state.
If anything, these pro-lifers are delusional and not living in reality while the pessimists are being realistic albeit gloomy and depressing. The truth is there are lots of suffering in the world and just because one form of suffering is less (or even different from another) does not discount that suffering is a negative and bad experience that must be resolved and/or avoided if possible.
Eye Doubt It's video here shows and debunks the reality of existence/life:
With that said, we pro-choicers may be pessimistic, but at least we are honest and in line with reality and not providing false hope nor living in a delusion, pretending things are all fine. While it is possible that pro-lifers may have experienced losses and negative things (as well as suffering), the fact that they mask it and try to suppress anything that may remind of what reality has in store for them is just wrong. In the video that I linked in this thread, life is full of suffering.
Another kind of pro-lifer (usually religious ones) is the one that tries to rationalize and justify the suffering that part of the beauty of life is also suffering. That is just as bad or perhaps even worse because they are attributing suffering to be a positive thing, which clearly is not. Just because everyone has to deal with suffering just by default does not mean that everyone should be expected to do so in the same way, let alone on the same terms. Everyone has their limits and view on how much suffering they are going to take. There are many more bad things and just because pro-lifers don't experience the worst of things does not imply that life is beautiful. Instead, life is full of (unnecessary) suffering and the cessation of existence or to never have been is not a bad thing, perhaps even a positive thing because the lack of suffering and nothingness can never be a bad thing. This is because even if nothingness itself is the absence of good things (since one would have be conscious and sentient to experience the good and the bad), the absence of bad things from the state of nothingness is a neutral state.